It had 35K people online just one week ago and now it only has 13,5K online!
Populations dropped, that means that it is a bad game.
English
#Gaming
-
gr8 b8 m8
-
1 Reply
-
1 ReplyEdited by DE4THINC4RN4TE: 10/28/2013 7:46:49 PM[quote]13[u],[/u]5[/quote] Get that commie euro numbering system out of here. The INTERNET BELONGS TO 'MURICA.
-
9 RepliesEdited by BritLemon: 10/27/2013 4:22:03 PMur mum is a bad gaem #rekt
-
-
*Gets the ban hammer ready for DeeJ*
-
3 RepliesThree words. DIFFERENT TIME ZONES!
-
1 ReplyWell he's telling the truth, despite his reasoning.
-
9 RepliesWhat the -blam!- are you talking about?! Before Microsoft made Halo 3 free, there was only 3k online. The max was 6k. From the summer till now that's a big improvement.
-
I think this thread is a pretty good reason why the population argument is full of holes.
-
That really rustled my jimmies!
-
4 Replies13.5k Damn brits and their commas.
-
its an awful waful
-
4 RepliesHalo 4 is not a bad game, it's just not so popular (fewer people think it's a good game).
-
1 ReplyYou really should see the Waypoint fanbase. Some of them literally are abusing the resurgence of Halo 3 and how its population is surpassing Halo 4's.
-
-
13 RepliesEdited by Fresh Pancake: 10/27/2013 9:22:25 PMHalo CE is the worst of them all, even worse then Halo 3, it's online population is always 0. Population of 0 < Dropping population [spoiler]Jk please don't hurt me.[/spoiler]
-
3 RepliesThese threads are coming out of nowhere all of a sudden.
-
4 RepliesSo just cause not as much people play a game as much as they used to it means it sucks?? Face palm dude
-
-
Halo 3 = good Halo 3 netcode = bad
-
3 Repliesf*** you
-
Omg it rite