{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
6/6/2017 5:28:25 PM
20
-
[quote]Yeah they'll be sure to add all that to a pve game.[/quote] Going from D1 to D2 is reducing content no matter how you look at it. Y1 even had maps you could even make it 8v8. Taking the team modes away was a bad move.
-
Think you missed my point
-
Bungie's idea on adding content to PvE is making things appear to look bigger than they actually are. The Dreadnought is a prime example. I don't expect much more then what they offered in D1 which wasn't much at all.
-
Age of triumphs was the right direction. Tons of raids available at any time
-
[quote]Age of triumphs was the right direction. Tons of raids available at any time[/quote] Tons of raids available.This is a joke right? I seem to remember 2 being available for 3 years and one available for 2 years now called KF with ROI new raid. So don't know where you thought you were going with this other then regrinding for things you already acquired. Sorry, things that you have already acquired is not new things if you have it already.
-
I'm sorry 4 is alot for raids so I'll still say tons of raids. No age of triumph didn't add any new raids nor did I say it did, you make it look like you didn't read my comment.
-
Edited by TheShadow: 6/6/2017 11:30:28 PM[quote]I'm sorry 4 is alot for raids so I'll still say tons of raids. No age of triumph didn't add any new raids nor did I say it did, you make it look like you didn't read my comment.[/quote] You posted that it had 4 raids available knowing they have always been available. It was a statement that was pointless. And the triumph statment of it heading in the right direction is just "your" opinion. When gamers like me no none of them raids needed to be Irrelevant in the first place. What Bungie did with the triumph they could of done over a year ago. ROI should of been added with Ttk 6 monthe later and gamers should of been playing D2 right now. The lack of effort and content in this game to keep a stready flow is the problem with this company. Always scrambling to meet deadlines resulting in having a pushed out product. The "triumph" was an insult knowing this company can do a lot more but cutting corners seems to be the motto now.
-
You're contradicting yourself
-
Nice try, try again :)
-
Did the message not work?
-
[quote]Did the message not work?[/quote] I'm talking to a wall. There was never any messages. Rambling about 2 different aspects of the game... The first one everyone knew already but apparently not you lol. The second was just "your opinion"
-
Oh so you're just an idiot then, got it.
-
[quote]Oh so you're just an idiot then, got it.[/quote] That was weak at best lol. [spoiler]Try again...[/spoiler]
-
It took three years to get there....remember how much content was available at launch? Not a whole lot.
-
Plenty
-
It lasted two weeks worth of playing
-
What? How? It lasted til dark below
-
Within two weeks everything was complete with the exception of the raid since it wasnt out
-
No that's not true. Iron banner, and Queens wrath were really good events early on, and not everything was completed in 2 weeks.
-
Those werent released at launch so those dont change the point of it took two weeks to finish all content at launch. It has taken three years to get all this stuff
