{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
7/4/2014 1:17:01 PM
8
You already made this thread, and Recon already addressed this belief.
Stop baiting.
English
-
Different video, quote made by the guy in charge of the ship building operation...... Its not baiting and Recon said the ship is bigger and can run further, doesn't mean its better because of it.
-
[quote]Recon said the ship is bigger and can run further, doesn't mean its better because of it.[/quote]Considering the mission and purpose of an aircraft carrier, larger capacity and greater range would mean that one ship is better than the other.
-
Range and number of planes aren't the only things to compare them with. Our pilots and crew could out match yours which makes numbers pointless.
-
Ah, and here we get in to the pointless nationalistic shit. I'll ignore that since there's no basis for it. See now, I joke a lot about the F-22 having 0 confirmed kills, but technologically and performance wise, it's a better platform than the Typhoon. However, the QE is planned to be launched with a whole bunch of F-35's, right? Unfortunately for you again, the F-35 is very inferior to the F-22 in terms of air to air and even air to ground capabilities, [url=http://i.imgur.com/MFOWATn.jpg]since it's basically the Wal-mart version of the raptor. [/url] Our AF is actually realizing now that the 35 can't replace the 22, and we need to keep our Raptor fleet if we don't want the new fleet of Lightnings to be ineffective, which raises the question of why we're even making the damn things... But anyway, 'Murrica.
