{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
4/4/2013 8:53:05 AM
13
I'm not one to complain about 343, but this is ridiculous.
I was playing Halo Reach the other day and noticed the population was at about 20k. I was surprised at how high it was, so I checked Halo 4's population. It was barely 30k. Halo 4 is barely leading in population. A half year old game is losing to a game two years older than it, from the SAME franchise. I just... wow... just wow.
I don't want to see the Halo Franchise die like this. It's not nearly epic enough. I want it to die in a fiery explosion, not slowly being snuffed out in the night. So as a fan, how would you propose we fix this dilemma?
-
5 RepliesI think after 343's abortion of a presentation at GDC, most of the people holding out hoping Halol 4 would get better have finally given up on 343 and Halol 4. As a result, those same fans [i]still[/i] ove Halo, so the only two viable games left (that involve multiplayer) are Halo 3 and Halo: Reach. Personally; I've been cruising H3 and Reach for the last several months since I returned my copy of Halol 4, and with each week it gets a bit easier and easier to find games. It'll be funny to think about how MS would come down on 343 should Reach and/or H3 overtake Halol 4 in daily populace. that would make me laugh indeed.
