{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
Edited by lonepaul2441:
2/19/2013 2:16:38 PM
12
new carrier, bigger than America's super carriers
[quote]What is blue, a quarter of a mile long, and taller than London's Olympic stadium?
The answer: this year's new class of container ship, the Triple E. When it goes into service this June, it will be the largest vessel ploughing the sea.[/quote]
If this thing is the biggest ship on the sea and probably costs less to upkeep than an aircraft carrier and built to be somewhat similar to help against piracy, couldn't we just launch aircraft off this thing until the real ones are ready?
-
1 ReplyA wild iceberg appears.
-
1 ReplyWOW, IT'S BIGGER THAN AMERICA'S SHIPS! Why should we care?
-
1 ReplyIt's a container ship. It really doesn't matter that it's bigger than an American supercarrier because this ship can't launch aircraft. Hell, it has no military capabilities at all.
-
3 RepliesIt's danish you -blam!-ing berk.
-
It's not how big it is, it's what you do with it.
-
Now, the USA, being the USA, will want to build a [i]bigger[/i] one.
-
It's the Egg [i]Carrier....[/i]
-
1 Replynext stop: a ship big enough to house an entire country.
-
1 ReplyTriple E, you say? And I thought Double Ds were the standard for big.
-
Of course it'd cost lost, there isn't 2,000-3,000 people you need to hire to keep it running, on top of the charges to maintain it's defenses, aircraft, etc.
-
Holy hell ships that big military wise are asking to get sunk
-
Edited by Lord Commissar: 2/19/2013 10:21:40 AMIt's essentially a giant floating box. Woopdy-fucking-doo.
