{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
7/15/2007 2:21:49 AM
207
WTF. Halo 3 locked at 30 fps!
Hey everyone,
Look at this!
7:48-7:58
[url=http://www.gamersyde.com/stream_4117_en.html] Link [/url]
Honestly, I think this is very bad. Bungie says they're in competition(sp?) with some of the best graphics (GOW, etc.)
Almost every game now runs at 60fps. I'm speechless.
MAJOR EDIT (ANOTHER!!!!!)
[url=http://www.daniele.ch/school/30vs60/30vs60_1.html] 30fps vs 60 fps (there's a big difference!!!) [/url]
HERE'S PROOF (I'll add more as I go along):
Football
[url=http://www.xbox360fanboy.com/2007/07/02/60-fps-football-will-be-better-on-the-360/] Link [/url]
Half-Life Orange Box
[url=http://xbox360.gamespy.com/xbox-360/half-life-2/736576p1.html] Link [/url]
Resident Evil 5
[url=http://www.revolution.joystiq.com/2006/12/22/resident-evil-5-plays-hot-and-cold/] Link [/url]
Soulcaliber 4
[url=http://www.1up.com/do/newsStory?cId=3160282] Link [/url]
Doom 3
[url=http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=12311] Link [/url]
Super Mario Galaxy
[url=http://gonintendo.com/?p=9266] Link [/url]
Big Link Where I got a bunch of those games
[url=http://www.revolution.joystiq.com/search/?q=60+fps&x=23&y=13] Link [/url]
Are you mad or what?!
[Edited on 07.14.2007 8:58 PM PDT]
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] otis42 Regardless if it's more than fine this casts doubts on Bungie that they're games are pushed to the highest technical limit as possible. They've passed the test on network programming (the goliath of a challenge of getting four people online with the A.I reacting intelligently enough) they have the graphics but if the framerate is not as high as it can be than they are not making the best technical game. And if you doubt few people do 60 fps with alot of things check out Burnout: Dominator. Online Co-op with explosions and all those particles flying around at 60fps. However if they had to choose between 4 player online co-op and 60fps i would have most gladly taken 4 player Co-op.[/quote] Apples to Oranges, my friend. You simply can't compare a racing game, and a first person shooter.
-
Regardless if it's more than fine this casts doubts on Bungie that they're games are pushed to the highest technical limit as possible. They've passed the test on network programming (the goliath of a challenge of getting four people online with the A.I reacting intelligently enough) they have the graphics but if the framerate is not as high as it can be than they are not making the best technical game. And if you doubt few people do 60 fps with alot of things check out Burnout: Dominator. Online Co-op with explosions and all those particles flying around at 60fps. However if they had to choose between 4 player online co-op and 60fps i would have most gladly taken 4 player Co-op.
-
30 FPS is already more than fine.
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] MLG Cheehwawa Don't films run at like 24 FPS anyway? No big deal.[/quote] 24 would be terrible. It's 30. TC, no way GoW is locked at 60fps have you played it? THe only game I can think of right now that's locked at 60 on a console is CoD4. 30fps is fine, it is the average. -----edit----- TC, none of the games you listed have nearly as much action or scale that Halo 3 will have. [Edited on 08.22.2007 1:18 AM PDT]
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] GnaM LOL, 30 FPS,,,what is this, Xbox 180? A lot of people I know are used to running games like Quake 3 at 120+ FPS, and were pissed when Doom 3 had a mandatory 60 FPS cap. 30 FPS is for last-gen console games.[/quote] What are you retarded? Do you have any idea what you're actually talking about? I doubt it. [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Tormey Time Wow what a waste of space on this forum. When the game actually comes out on the 25th, you're all going to forget about the frame rate anyways. The only thing you will worry about is staying home sick from work/school to play the game. GOW sucks, its not even a FPS. No one will even play that game when halo 3 comes out.[/quote] WHY did you revive this thread? Last post before you on 7/23, way to go buddy.
-
LOL, 30 FPS,,,what is this, Xbox 180? A lot of people I know are used to running games like Quake 3 at 120+ FPS, and were pissed when Doom 3 had a mandatory 60 FPS cap. 30 FPS is for last-gen console games.
-
Its fast enough [Edited on 08.22.2007 12:56 AM PDT]
-
From what I have seen 30 FPS looks pretty damn good to me. Plus who cares, just play the game if you don't like how it looks or runs don't play it.
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Se7en7hDes7royer [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Abs_of_flab Its very rare for a shooter to run at 60 fps. The only 1 I can think of right now is COD4.[/quote] Uhhhhhhhhhhh^^^^^ GOW....[/quote] It is not an fps you -blam!- idiot
-
1 ReplyWow what a waste of space on this forum. When the game actually comes out on the 25th, you're all going to forget about the frame rate anyways. The only thing you will worry about is staying home sick from work/school to play the game. GOW sucks, its not even a FPS. No one will even play that game when halo 3 comes out.
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Ltsmum I really really really really don't care[/quote]
-
I really really really really don't care
-
All of the halo games have come really close around 30fps, now I guess there are people that think there is a big difference between 30 and 60fps, well there is but on the count of the game. Halo games are just ment for 30fps so there is no difference so get use to it!!! Halo 2 was something near 30fps and halo 3 is going to be 30fps, also its running on a better system, whats so bad about that really. Now if bungie is saying that Halo 3 is going to run at 30 fps, then look at the gameplay halo 3 trailer at E3. IT WAS BEAUTIFUL, so if there is something wrong then you guys must have a problem, I mean that stuff was from the campaign from the game so if you dont like it just dont play Halo anymore. [Edited on 07.27.2007 12:09 AM PDT]
-
Well, I watched E3, and still COD4 should not beat Halo 3 at fps rate... And I have played COD2 also. No wonder COD3 was so bad! the campaign is horrible, but at least COD2 I was able to beat!
-
I'm sorry but Halo 2 ran at 30 FPS and Gears of War runs at 30 FPS. There is a HUGE difference between 30 and 60 FPS. [Edited on 07.22.2007 3:04 PM PDT]
-
Well, I don't disagree there. I just disagreed with saying , or implying for that matter, that there was little difference between 30 and 60 fps.
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] BeanTwnBeatDown [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Ice Fox 805 the human eye only needs EIGHT frames a second to have it tricked into a moving image, 30 frames (almost 4 times as much) will do just fine. [/quote] While I am not sure it is THAT big a concern for this game, I disagree with your argument, That is like the people who say there is no difference between 720p and 1080p there is a great deal of difference in 30 and 60 fps[/quote] did anyone complain about halo 2's frame rate at 23 fps, no, 30 is just fine. it won't ruin the game and everyone will enjoy it nonetheless [Edited on 07.22.2007 3:02 PM PDT]
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Ice Fox 805 the human eye only needs EIGHT frames a second to have it tricked into a moving image, 30 frames (almost 4 times as much) will do just fine. [/quote] While I am not sure it is THAT big a concern for this game, I disagree with your argument, That is like the people who say there is no difference between 720p and 1080p there is a great deal of difference in 30 and 60 fps
-
the human eye only needs EIGHT frames a second to have it tricked into a moving image, 30 frames (almost 4 times as much) will do just fine.
-
Bungie has outwardly said they would sacrifice graphics for gameplay, this includes framerate. They are developing their own engine (which is rare for FPS's these days) and the game looks very good. It may not look as great as a few other specific games I have seen, Call of Duty 4 included in that, (graphics wise) but, hopefull they gameplay will make up for it. It is hard to tell with arbitrary facts like the frame rate when Bungie has said they put their confidence in their gameplay. [Edited on 07.22.2007 2:56 PM PDT]
-
The Beta was fine. Wasn't choppy at all.
-
COD4 really has caused a stir... and rightfully so. Can't wait until August for the Beta. Still, Halo 3 should be fine with...um....30fps =P [Edited on 07.22.2007 2:48 PM PDT]
-
30fps locked is better than Gears of War and Oblivion and the Darkness can claim so stop complaining.
-
frankie actually tried to say 300 but accidentally said 30.
-
yea, CoD 3 is not the same developers as CoD 4. The people who made CoD 2 are making CoD 4: [url=http://www.infinityward.com/]Infinity Ward[/url].
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] TheGerman [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Abs_of_flab Its very rare for a shooter to run at 60 fps. The only 1 I can think of right now is COD4.[/quote] Wow, then Halo 3 will be not the game I was excpecting if it cant even keep up with COD4. Cause Call of duty is very bad in terms of graphics and fps. I have COD3 so I know what Im talking about.[/quote] Im guessing you've never seen any trailers of pictures for Cod4 then? It won't look or run like Cod4 at all. The company that made Cod3 isn't even making Cod4.
