{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
10/16/2010 2:47:53 AM
95
I heard that living space was tight in some asian countries....
But [url=http://www.nickscipio.com/pod/media/2010/10/Creepy-dolls.jpg]this is ridiculous[/url]!
I mean there's more room on a submarine!
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Bearded Elf [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Recon Number 54 [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Bearded Elf I'm sure Qbix89 can find that rule again.[/quote] If I just created a topic entitled "funny pic", gave the link and said "discuss", then yes... that would have been lock, warn or even ban-worthy. But we're discussing (two topics actually, one on, one slightly off). I honestly don't see a rule violation, or I would have either not have posted or (if it were pointed out to me) I would lock it and consider myself warned and educated.[/quote]The original post in this topic did nothing to inspire discussion other than posting an entertaining image. Just because a discussion formed doesn't mean your post shouldn't be considered spam. If a mod came across your post before anybody replied to it, there's nothing to encourage people to discuss it. You didn't pose a question to the forum, or post your stance on a controversial, but allowed by forum rules, subject. What's the difference between your original post and the scenario you provided? You used proper sentence structure and grammar. Is that really what defines content on this forum? My ban history disagrees.[/quote] fair enough. I will consider myself warned, lock the thread and stay off of the forums for a couple of days as punishment. I just got the box set of Evangelion, might as well watch it.
-
You always have the weirdest threads.
-
Hello? Recon you still awake?
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Bearded Elf [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] The Highwayman48 [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Bearded Elf [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Recon Number 54 [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Bearded Elf I'm sure Qbix89 can find that rule again.[/quote] If I just created a topic entitled "funny pic", gave the link and said "discuss", then yes... that would have been lock, warn or even ban-worthy. But we're discussing (two topics actually, one on, one slightly off).It's entertaining to watch a guy who's been banned more than 0 times try and convince a maod that he broke a rule. I honestly don't see a rule violation, or I would have either not have posted or (if it were pointed out to me) I would lock it and consider myself warned and educated.[/quote]The original post in this topic did nothing to inspire discussion other than posting an entertaining image. Just because a discussion formed doesn't mean your post shouldn't be considered spam. If a mod came across your post before anybody replied to it, there's nothing to encourage people to discuss it. You didn't pose a question to the forum, or post your stance on a controversial, but allowed by forum rules, subject. What's the difference between your original post and the scenario you provided? You used proper sentence structure and grammar. Is that really what defines content on this forum? My ban history disagrees.[/quote] It's entertaining to watch a guy who's been banned more than 10 times try and convince a mod that he broke a rule.[/quote]It's because I know from experience.[/quote] I'm not saying that you don't know what you're talking about it's just kinda ironic.
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] The Highwayman48 [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Bearded Elf [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Recon Number 54 [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Bearded Elf I'm sure Qbix89 can find that rule again.[/quote] If I just created a topic entitled "funny pic", gave the link and said "discuss", then yes... that would have been lock, warn or even ban-worthy. But we're discussing (two topics actually, one on, one slightly off).It's entertaining to watch a guy who's been banned more than 0 times try and convince a maod that he broke a rule. I honestly don't see a rule violation, or I would have either not have posted or (if it were pointed out to me) I would lock it and consider myself warned and educated.[/quote]The original post in this topic did nothing to inspire discussion other than posting an entertaining image. Just because a discussion formed doesn't mean your post shouldn't be considered spam. If a mod came across your post before anybody replied to it, there's nothing to encourage people to discuss it. You didn't pose a question to the forum, or post your stance on a controversial, but allowed by forum rules, subject. What's the difference between your original post and the scenario you provided? You used proper sentence structure and grammar. Is that really what defines content on this forum? My ban history disagrees.[/quote] It's entertaining to watch a guy who's been banned more than 10 times try and convince a mod that he broke a rule.[/quote]It's because I know from experience.
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Bearded Elf [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Recon Number 54 [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Bearded Elf I'm sure Qbix89 can find that rule again.[/quote] If I just created a topic entitled "funny pic", gave the link and said "discuss", then yes... that would have been lock, warn or even ban-worthy. But we're discussing (two topics actually, one on, one slightly off).It's entertaining to watch a guy who's been banned more than 0 times try and convince a maod that he broke a rule. I honestly don't see a rule violation, or I would have either not have posted or (if it were pointed out to me) I would lock it and consider myself warned and educated.[/quote]The original post in this topic did nothing to inspire discussion other than posting an entertaining image. Just because a discussion formed doesn't mean your post shouldn't be considered spam. If a mod came across your post before anybody replied to it, there's nothing to encourage people to discuss it. You didn't pose a question to the forum, or post your stance on a controversial, but allowed by forum rules, subject. What's the difference between your original post and the scenario you provided? You used proper sentence structure and grammar. Is that really what defines content on this forum? My ban history disagrees.[/quote] It's entertaining to watch a guy who's been banned more than 10 times try and convince a mod that he broke a rule. [Edited on 10.15.2010 7:42 PM PDT]
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] The Highwayman48 This is quite random and off-topic but I just remembered something. When I first started coming to Bungie.net(before I had an account or knew anything about the site) I friend requested you Recon.[/quote]i think i did too, oh yea question recon, im not asking you to do this but, ive been on this site for 4 years, and im still just a normal member! whats up with that?
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Recon Number 54 [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Bearded Elf I'm sure Qbix89 can find that rule again.[/quote] If I just created a topic entitled "funny pic", gave the link and said "discuss", then yes... that would have been lock, warn or even ban-worthy. But we're discussing (two topics actually, one on, one slightly off). I honestly don't see a rule violation, or I would have either not have posted or (if it were pointed out to me) I would lock it and consider myself warned and educated.[/quote]The original post in this topic did nothing to inspire discussion other than posting an entertaining image. Just because a discussion formed doesn't mean your post shouldn't be considered spam. If a mod came across your post before anybody replied to it, there's nothing to encourage people to discuss it. You didn't pose a question to the forum, or post your stance on a controversial, but allowed by forum rules, subject. What's the difference between your original post and the scenario you provided? You used proper sentence structure and grammar. Is that really what defines content on this forum? My ban history disagrees.
-
This is quite random and off-topic but I just remembered something. When I first started coming to Bungie.net(before I had an account or knew anything about the site) I friend requested you Recon.
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] bulldogs69 [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Recon Number 54 [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Vadam930 [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Recon Number 54 The link is (at worst) PG-13[/quote]And my ISP blocks it. Fantastic.[/quote] Your ISP is likely blocking the whole domain, which is a mix of anything from PG-13 up to adults only. Which is why I linked only to that image. When I have (in the past) linked to POD from that site (where the specifically linked content was within the limits of this site) I almost always got crap over people then browsing the site (by following links after my link) that I was "linking to pr0n". By linking to the image, someone has to manually edit their URL to see something... "shocking".[/quote] Here's the picture [url=http://oi56.tinypic.com/dhbl1e.jpg]tinypic style[/url][/quote] Ok. That's retarded. Haha
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Nerd Boi [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Recon Number 54 What I don't understand is why if someone had that sort of money (my curiosity lead to research and my research educated me that these are NOT cheap) to buy this many of them, why they didn't simply pay some "out of work actress" aka:a ho for their company.[/quote][url=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e6raVzrbqrM]Somewhat relevant.[/url][/quote] quite clever actually.
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] VictoryIan [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] The Highwayman48 [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] VictoryIan [url=http://mm04.nasaimages.org/MediaManager/srvr?mediafile=/Size4/nasaNAS-9-NA/61338/6900903.jpg&userid=1&username=admin&resolution=4&servertype=JVA&cid=9&iid=nasaNAS&vcid=NA&usergroup=Marshall_-_nasa-9-Admin&profileid=41]i beg to differ[/url][/quote] That's just a hallway but ya it's pretty dam small.[/quote]in a submarine[/quote] I know that I mean that it's just a hallway it's not really living space.
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Im5andwatisthis Thats just a small submarine[/quote] You've obviously never been on a modern submarine.
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Recon Number 54 What I don't understand is why if someone had that sort of money (my curiosity lead to research and my research educated me that these are NOT cheap) to buy this many of them, why they didn't simply pay some "out of work actress" aka:a ho for their company.[/quote][url=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e6raVzrbqrM]Somewhat relevant.[/url]
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] The Highwayman48 [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] bulldogs69 [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Recon Number 54 [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Vadam930 [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Recon Number 54 The link is (at worst) PG-13[/quote]And my ISP blocks it. Fantastic.[/quote] Your ISP is likely blocking the whole domain, which is a mix of anything from PG-13 up to adults only. Which is why I linked only to that image. When I have (in the past) linked to POD from that site (where the specifically linked content was within the limits of this site) I almost always got crap over people then browsing the site (by following links after my link) that I was "linking to pr0n". By linking to the image, someone has to manually edit their URL to see something... "shocking".[/quote] Here's the picture [url=http://oi56.tinypic.com/dhbl1e.jpg]tinypic style[/url][/quote] What's the difference?[/quote] His ISP is blocking the site recon gave, so I tinypic'd it so he can see it.
-
Thats just a small submarine [Edited on 10.15.2010 7:33 PM PDT]
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] The Highwayman48 [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] VictoryIan [url=http://mm04.nasaimages.org/MediaManager/srvr?mediafile=/Size4/nasaNAS-9-NA/61338/6900903.jpg&userid=1&username=admin&resolution=4&servertype=JVA&cid=9&iid=nasaNAS&vcid=NA&usergroup=Marshall_-_nasa-9-Admin&profileid=41]i beg to differ[/url][/quote] That's just a hallway but ya it's pretty dam small.[/quote]in a submarine
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] bulldogs69 [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Recon Number 54 [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Vadam930 [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Recon Number 54 The link is (at worst) PG-13[/quote]And my ISP blocks it. Fantastic.[/quote] Your ISP is likely blocking the whole domain, which is a mix of anything from PG-13 up to adults only. Which is why I linked only to that image. When I have (in the past) linked to POD from that site (where the specifically linked content was within the limits of this site) I almost always got crap over people then browsing the site (by following links after my link) that I was "linking to pr0n". By linking to the image, someone has to manually edit their URL to see something... "shocking".[/quote] Here's the picture [url=http://oi56.tinypic.com/dhbl1e.jpg]tinypic style[/url][/quote] What's the difference? [Edited on 10.15.2010 7:32 PM PDT]
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] VictoryIan [url=http://mm04.nasaimages.org/MediaManager/srvr?mediafile=/Size4/nasaNAS-9-NA/61338/6900903.jpg&userid=1&username=admin&resolution=4&servertype=JVA&cid=9&iid=nasaNAS&vcid=NA&usergroup=Marshall_-_nasa-9-Admin&profileid=41]i beg to differ[/url][/quote] That's just a hallway but ya it's pretty dam small.
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Recon Number 54 [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Vadam930 [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Recon Number 54 The link is (at worst) PG-13[/quote]And my ISP blocks it. Fantastic.[/quote] Your ISP is likely blocking the whole domain, which is a mix of anything from PG-13 up to adults only. Which is why I linked only to that image. When I have (in the past) linked to POD from that site (where the specifically linked content was within the limits of this site) I almost always got crap over people then browsing the site (by following links after my link) that I was "linking to pr0n". By linking to the image, someone has to manually edit their URL to see something... "shocking".[/quote] Here's the picture [url=http://oi56.tinypic.com/dhbl1e.jpg]tinypic style[/url]
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Bearded Elf I'm sure Qbix89 can find that rule again.[/quote] If I just created a topic entitled "funny pic", gave the link and said "discuss", then yes... that would have been lock, warn or even ban-worthy. But we're discussing (two topics actually, one on, one slightly off). I honestly don't see a rule violation, or I would have either not have posted or (if it were pointed out to me) I would lock it and consider myself warned and educated.
-
[url=http://mm04.nasaimages.org/MediaManager/srvr?mediafile=/Size4/nasaNAS-9-NA/61338/6900903.jpg&userid=1&username=admin&resolution=4&servertype=JVA&cid=9&iid=nasaNAS&vcid=NA&usergroup=Marshall_-_nasa-9-Admin&profileid=41]i beg to differ[/url]
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Bearded Elf [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Recon Number 54 [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] coolmike699 I'm not "enraged". I totally expected that answer. Am I a little annoyed that you post something as clearly and obviously rule-breaking as this, when a regualar member would almost certainly get banned for it? Yeah. But it's just an Internet forum. [/quote] I'm not sure where this is rule breaking. The link is (at worst) PG-13, and it was posted with the purpose and intent to generate discussion (even if the discussion is partially us talking about its relevance within the rules). I read the rules frequently and try to enforce them to the best of my ability and understanding. Do you have a specific rule or portion of the Terms of Use or Code of Conduct that you consider this to be in violation of?[/quote]I'm sure Qbix89 can find that rule again.[/quote] Lol yah I bet he could.
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Vadam930 [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Recon Number 54 The link is (at worst) PG-13[/quote]And my ISP blocks it. Fantastic.[/quote] Your ISP is likely blocking the whole domain, which is a mix of anything from PG-13 up to adults only. Which is why I linked only to that image. When I have (in the past) linked to POD from that site (where the specifically linked content was within the limits of this site) I almost always got crap over people then browsing the site (by following links after my link) that I was "linking to pr0n". By linking to the image, someone has to manually edit their URL to see something... "shocking".
-
It kind of reminds me of the inside of a Hercules carrying wounded/dead soldiers
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Recon Number 54 [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] coolmike699 I'm not "enraged". I totally expected that answer. Am I a little annoyed that you post something as clearly and obviously rule-breaking as this, when a regualar member would almost certainly get banned for it? Yeah. But it's just an Internet forum. [/quote] I'm not sure where this is rule breaking. The link is (at worst) PG-13, and it was posted with the purpose and intent to generate discussion (even if the discussion is partially us talking about its relevance within the rules). I read the rules frequently and try to enforce them to the best of my ability and understanding. Do you have a specific rule or portion of the Terms of Use or Code of Conduct that you consider this to be in violation of?[/quote]I'm sure Qbix89 can find that rule again.
