{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
5/24/2011 11:09:57 PM
597
Credit Reset Disputes - 5/24/2011
Good afternoon,
We have executed a round of Credit Resets for accounts which have habitually exhibited idling or "AFK" behavior while playing in Firefight Matchmaking. If you believe your ban was a false positive, you can post a request for investigation.
[b]Only request an investigation if you are absolutely sure that your ban was a false positive, if we take the time to investigate your account and find that you do have idling or "AFK" behavior, we will place an extended Credit Ban on your account.[/b]
Do not use this thread for any other discussion. If you are not requesting an investigation of your Credit Reset from 5/24/2011, do not post in this thread.
Thank you for your cooperation.
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Toilet Being [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] HaRrBrO0608 [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Toilet Being How about you fix the problem you caused instead of banning people? The piss poor scoring system is why people AFK in the first place, you cowards.[/quote]Umad? There is nothing wrong with it. You guys are just too lazy to actually play a legitimate game in firefight. [/quote] I've never played firefight, I've never AFKed, I've never been banned for AFKing. Quit making assumptions. AFKing doesn't hurt you, and the ban does more harm than good. Bungie should fix the mess THEY created, not implement a ban that is easily avoided and harms the innocent.[/quote]Did I ever say YOU specifically? Quit making assumptions. The banning system does exactly what it's suppose too. Now people will know not to AFK and ruin other player's experience. What mess are you talking about? Don't blame it on Bungie for other people's actions. If you mean innocent people as in being banned for the wrong reasons, thats why Jeremiah said whoever feels they are wrongly accused, they can be looked into. [Edited on 05.24.2011 3:45 PM PDT]
