-
Did you read the post?
-
Edited by Litwicks_Souls: 5/28/2017 7:04:35 PMYes, at the end he says "I say they purposely put this glitch in D2" which means it's confirmed to be in D2.
-
No. He's making a statement. As in "He thinks they should put the glitch back in in Destiny 2." Reading comprehension is hard.
-
No, he clearly made it sound like it was in the game. He should have worded it better. Now hop outta here.
-
The problem really comes from the word put; it has no past tense. The identical sentences "I say they put the glitch into the game on purpose" and "I say they put the glitch into the game on purpose" mean two entirely different things, since both use the same conjugation and tense. -blam!- English.
-
But he didn't say it like that. He said "I say they purposely put the glitch in D2." indicating that it's already there.
-
That's one way to interpret it, but because put is also the present tense you can read it as "I say they [i]should[/i] put it in the game" as opposed to "I say they [i]have[/i] put it in the game"
-
Edited by Litwicks_Souls: 5/29/2017 2:54:44 AMStop arguing, you're one reason this community is toxic. I only asked a simple question and you're trying to be smart which isn't gonna work for me.
-
I'm not trying to be combative or toxic, and I'm sorry if I'm coming across that way. I'm just trying to explain how the op's wording is technically correct. It definitely could have been worded better, though.
-
No. "should" is something you'd like them to do while "have" is something you own or already did.
-
Exactly. And because put is both past, present, and future tense, if you leave out the helping verb in front of it you can assume either one to be true. You read it as [i]have[/i] put, me and most of the other people here read it as [i]should[/i] put, which is what op intended.
-
Yes, I know what OP [i]should[/i] have put, but he didn't. It's called being a troll. I know what he meant 😂
-
Oh. Well then continue to troll, good sir :D