{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
2/16/2017 12:54:01 PM
2
I used the doctrine arch type and did fine soooooo......
Also all primaries seem to be viable, nothing stands out as best in class and nothing seems to lack luster.
I think the problem most people having right now is skill based match making, though not as harsh as before, is still there. So you have these people who were pub stomping with secondaries and aren't very good with primaries getting stomped by people who are good with primaries. I love this meta! I've had more 20+ kill games in the last 2 days than the last few months. I've had more 10 kill streaks in the last two days than I did the entire time rise of iron has been out. This primary meta actually takes some skill and most people can't handle it. The skill gap is real.
English
-
The doctrine archetype has been good all of year 3, just nobody used anything but clever dragon which is better
-
Great, and I see how it mixes up things. But at what expense? Are we going to just accept the problems that came with this update to "settle" and brush them off? You might not want to agree, and that's fine, but I'd way rather a group of talented players sit down and readjust balancing within our classes and guns than to settle with this abomination of a hotfix.
