{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
Edited by kerrandda:
6/10/2016 4:34:30 AM
54
Why does Rise of Iron require Taken King (and expansion 1/2) +poll
OK so i checked out the store page for the new destiny DLC and it says it requires taken king, what the... where is any deal the includes previous game dlc? I skipped out on TK but have all of year one so (if there is not going to be a bundle deal like in TK) why is there none (i would not mind paying 50ish$ for both) it just seems that they are going to be dwindling their fan base more by forcing the players who did not want TK to buy it just for this Dlc (dlc for dlc thats what this is lol).,
With that said while there is still time to cement more payment options for not just the non TK players who may want back in but all players who left between any dlcs. Bungie should hears us and makes sure if they are doing this requires previous expansion thing they need to have more deals for every player who wants to buy the expansion now or later.
side note for anyone who DID NOT buy the taken king are you interested in getting the next dlc
-
10 RepliesI don't have TTK, I however considered buying ROI, that is until I saw "requires TTK expansion". The reason I chose not to buy it is not because of the money (TTK is only £20 so hardly going to break the bank), but the ethics behind the whole "requires TDB, HOW and TTK". Bungie have essentially made the choice for you: "buy all dlc or be left out altogether". If you look at TTK, it requires both TDB and HOW expansions, however none of that content is relevant and nobody plays the missions, even the old raids are completely pointless, some will choose to play solely for the nostalgia, other than that there is no reason. Using this, we can conclude all/most of TTK content will become irrelevant, yet you'll need to fork out for it to play ROI.
