But [url=http://www.nickscipio.com/pod/media/2010/10/Creepy-dolls.jpg]this is ridiculous[/url]!
I mean there's more room on a submarine!
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] The Highwayman48 [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Bearded Elf [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Recon Number 54 [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Bearded Elf I'm sure Qbix89 can find that rule again.[/quote] If I just created a topic entitled "funny pic", gave the link and said "discuss", then yes... that would have been lock, warn or even ban-worthy. But we're discussing (two topics actually, one on, one slightly off).It's entertaining to watch a guy who's been banned more than 0 times try and convince a maod that he broke a rule. I honestly don't see a rule violation, or I would have either not have posted or (if it were pointed out to me) I would lock it and consider myself warned and educated.[/quote]The original post in this topic did nothing to inspire discussion other than posting an entertaining image. Just because a discussion formed doesn't mean your post shouldn't be considered spam. If a mod came across your post before anybody replied to it, there's nothing to encourage people to discuss it. You didn't pose a question to the forum, or post your stance on a controversial, but allowed by forum rules, subject. What's the difference between your original post and the scenario you provided? You used proper sentence structure and grammar. Is that really what defines content on this forum? My ban history disagrees.[/quote] It's entertaining to watch a guy who's been banned more than 10 times try and convince a mod that he broke a rule.[/quote]It's because I know from experience.