{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
7/3/2015 7:23:11 PM
26
£40 for TTK?
You're having a laugh. What is it with Activision and their pricing structure? They -blam!- their customers with the CoD franchise i.e. games & DLC, and now the same with Destiny.
Using the line that it isn't DLC but a whole new game? Tell me, apart from the obvious, what is the difference between DLC & a whole new game? Seriously, I want to know. £40 is the norm, or thereabouts, for a brand new game where they need to recoup initial dev costs, packaging, printing etc. So how is £40 for "not DLC" justifiable when 'tweaking" code is basically all that's happening.
Hell, they are forcing the dollar for pound sterling price too ffs.
And for all you ignorant fanboys with bungieitis, don't reply. This is an honest question requiring mature input and not the usual drivel of "you don't like it don't buy/ play it and gtfo OUR forums cos Destiny is the greatest thing since the last great thing and we refuse to have ANYBODY point out issues with our game".
English
#feedback
-
The price is that high because most here are sheep. Sorry, but that's the truth. They know you will buy it. Blood Dragon was a new game and it was $15. Bet it is two or three times bigger than this first "expansion". And it was Ubisoft. The thing is if they had price it $40 they knew it would probably had made people angry and it wouldn't have sold or be praised as well as it was. That's the difference here. Bungievision can count on their sheep to buy it at whatever price. Luke Smith's interview and his "apology" is proof of that.
