I love how religious people pick and choose what parts of the bible they follow and others they don't. Pathetic.

Feeding a gay family isn't an immoral thing to do. It's a decent thing to do. However, in regards to catering for gay marriages, printing gay T shirts, etc, doing so would suggest support or even create support for something you don't support, so why should a person be forced to do so?

Please note that the Bible isn't always right. The Book of Genesis was somewhat disproven by the big bang and evolution, and many of the sins written in the Bible were just socially unacceptable acts at the time.

Perfect example of people ignoring the parts of the bible they dont like.

There us 2 lines in this whole debate. One, we shouldn't be able to discriminate against someone's sexual orientation. Two, we shouldn't be able to tell someone who is religious what they can and cannot do.

I wouldn't skip this important part at the end "....they have committed a detestable act. They shall surely be put to death" -Leviticus 20:13. Not only is homosexuality forbidden, but the loving God's punishment for this is death. It's examples like this that lead rational people to suspect that it may be more likely that instead of containing divine teachings, this book was written by bronze-aged farmers with no knowledge of right or wrong. Don't forget that this was a time in which supernatural claims were as common then as fast food restaurants are common now. For those of you who are christian, I want you to ask yourself what is more likely: [b]A:[/b]A supernatural, all powerful being does in fact exist. This being just happens to be the exact one that is popular where you were born, and also luckily is the one portrayed by your exact demomination. Who works to ensure that his existence isn't proven, and whose plan is to leave the proof of his existence to vague hints and subjective experiences. This being not only is responsible for the creation of the entire universe just for our specific species on earth, but he even cares what you eat and who you sleep with. Not only that, but decided to provide both the absolute proof of his existence in a time when supernatural claims were already common and numerous. And also bestow his perfect unchanging word to a bunch of illiterate peasants in the form of divine messages to be passed around for 50+ years. Then finally written down by people who weren't witnessed, in a language that would soon become dead and require translation and reinterpretation. The final result of this divinely inspired code for all to follow included teachings of who can be enslaved and for how much, the command to stone homosexuals and unruly children, and numerous reminders that women are inferior to men. [b]Or.....[/b] [b]B.[/b] a group of people ignorant of the world made a mistake 2000 years ago.

Yes a business should be allowed to deny a wedding cake for a gay wedding. Freedom of religion boyz

If being gay is a sin why did God create somebody who's gay? Makes no sense -_- I'll tell you why it makes no sense... God isn't real people.

They aren't getting ignored ... I don't ignore them ... I personally think that homosexuality is a sin but so is lying and sometimes I lie ... Other people may not believe what believe but we can all agree that it's better not to be a hateful person

You could be a baker, and deny service to a gay couple that wants a wedding cake, but if you aren't a dick about it, and don't try to offend them, it isn't bad. You could have nothing against them personally, but you still don't have to condone their life choices.

See that's exactly what I've been trying to say, but nobody listens. We don't have to say that being gay is moral, but I can guarantee you that Jesus would have made a wedding cake for a gay couple.

Its a private business. If a business only wants to serve people with shirt and shoes, they can. If they don't want to allow firearms in thier business, they can. If they do not want to serve someone because of religion, they can. If you don't agree with it, don't go there