{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
4/19/2015 12:35:40 PM
28
Battlefront Instant Action
So, why is it that everyone seems to want Instant Action to return for the new Battlefront game? What's fun about beating up on half-retarded bots? MP will play literally the same way except with teammates/opponents that behave in a (mostly) reasonable manner.
I guess if you're awful at the game, bots make for a good place to practice, or if you don't have a stable Internet connection. But outside those two scenarios, I can't think of a reason as to why IA would be preferable to Online.
English
#Gaming
-
It's been a staple of my [i]personal[/i] battlefront experience as I didn't get XBL until 2008. Although, Internet issues aside, it's a mode that requires me to put forth far less effort into the combat in comparison to a multiplayer match. I can load up a series of maps forming my own private galactic campaign. It can be long or short and I get to decide who wins. In truth, the I never played much of the online of battlefront, only 1v1 + 62 bots, and I did that twice. To give you a more direct answer to why everyone wants it, Star Wars: Battlefront I&II are games that a good bit of console players of the sixth generation played and enjoyed. Thus, they grew up around being able to load into a map with 31 AI teammates whenever they wanted to. There's nothing wrong with a multiplayer match, but don't take a well known game that had both a single and multiplayer player function and lop off the former.
