[url=https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/pt/0/02/Elementor.png]Fire Elementor #1[/url]
[url=http://vignette2.wikia.nocookie.net/villains/images/9/9b/FireElementor2_profileImage_tcm422-50497.png/revision/latest?cb=20140113194854]Fire Elementor #2[/url]
[url=http://img3.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20130815174112/max-steel/pt-br/images/c/ca/Elementor.jpg]Fire Elementor #3[/url]
[url=http://vignette3.wikia.nocookie.net/max-steel-reboot/images/8/85/FireElementor.png/revision/latest?cb=20150605060632]Fire Elementor #4[/url]
-
4 3 1 2 In order
-
4 1 3 2 In that order
-
Numero uno
-
1 and 4 seem quite like these particular fire elementals, which is a good thing. [url=http://www.nexusroute.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/hevypyro1.jpg]Pyroviles, which by far are quite neat, save for their weakness to water.[/url] [url=http://arcadesushi.com/550/files/2013/05/header1.jpg]Ragnaros, the Firelord.[/url]
-
#1 & #4
-
We want full credit for choosing which one. When you became famous, as the spokesman I will take your funds and distribute them to all of my bank accounts
-
I liked 3, but what is this for?
-
I like 1
-
3 and 4 have cooler poses but 1 shows it better and shows the chest rock better and 2 is just a little odd Also if you dont mind why are you asking this?
-
Dang did you make these? They're pretty good
-
I'd say three. It really allows the "elemental" aspect of the creature to shine while simultaneously retaining enough physical details to implicate its beastly nature.
-
3 and 4 are epic.
-
None of the above
-
Honest opinion? Fire elementor #2. [spoiler]these are all pretty cool.[/spoiler]
-
MOM GET THE CAMERAAAA
-
Edited by LEGENDARYBardock: 12/21/2015 2:27:21 AMSame creature doing different poses 0/10