So I saw this in a feedback and wanted to highlight it. Why is it.. That on a next gen console, with hundreds of millions of dollars at their disposal, Bungie cannot complete a simple task such as storage? Oh we have to make tough choices and give up some guns and armor? Well Nintendo never made us give up pokemon even though we could only hold 6 at a time. You guys get where I'm coming from? A game boy has better storage options in a game then a PS4/XboxOne game.. That's kinda pathetic Bungie
English
#feedback
-
You know i forgot all about that, and good god. Have video games sunk so low?
-
I think they don't want you to have storage space. If you could keep all of the great guns you find, why buy more DLC?
-
Gotta catch all the exotics! Hahaha, now I'm imagining how bad pokemon would have sucked if it had the same storage space as destiny and we were forced to release pokemon to make space.
-
Also, Pokemon costs way less and you are given a complete game!
-
Last gen memory is lie. Bungie could give us more storage if they want to, but they dont...
-
pokedex entries have less plotholes than destiny.
-
Snorlax works for bungie only wakes up to make excuses about vault limits
-
I like how people are trying to defend this piece of shit, while the devs are just lying to all of us constantly :D
-
I was thinking this exact same thing months ago. You need to keep in mind that the size of a Pokemon is extremely small, but I'm sure if they reworked the way weapons are stored, it can be increased.
-
I think they just need to make pages for each of the groups. That would increase the vault space by a ton, and still allow us to keep the weapons we want. Idk, I never have storage problems. I have three characters, and I pretty much only use one set of armor for each, and they each have their own load out. As long as you don't hoard weapons, and bungie makes vault pages, I think it'll go pretty smoothly.
-
Im no expert but i think its because if they would have made it any bigger all kids on 360 and ps3 wouldnt have ben able to play. = less money
-
-
Don't give them any ideas relating to pokemon, or they might just copy pokemon bank where you pay a subscription fee for more storage.
-
I can have more pidgeys than Gallys
-
Roflmfao XD its true, remember that back in the old 1990s gameboy era on red and blue. They had more creature and item storage.
-
-
Fair statement. Never thought about it. Haha. I don't know what comes into play when it comes to making more storage available, but it seems simple enough to implement such a simple task. Why limit what your gamers on what they can have in storage or just limiting storage in general. I don't buy the whole last gen consoles holding us back at all. If that was the case you should've seen that one coming a mile away. Why waste time releasing a game for last gen if you know it was going to holdback current gen. Does that make sense? Bungie and their poor excuses of nerfing weapons and not being able to put in this and that is because your whole company sucks as a whole, and half of your better employees have left you to eat dust in the wind. Why you say? Because Bungie fails to execute such simple tasks that can be address. Good day!
-
I am also annoyed that they refuse to improve on the next gen platform because they don't want to give last gem the short stick. Well, they're all going to most likely get next gem eventually so why not give them an incentive. 1. Add in the better graphics that Bungie makes in concept before down grading it for console. This will help increasing the value of the game and making many of the areas more interesting and aesthetically pleasing. 2. It can allow for faster load times and also possibly better matchmaking. i.e. fewer laggy matches. 3. It will allow for significantly more vault space. When Bungie increased it last time they said it was the most they could do based on last gem limitations. Moving on from last gen, which will inevitably happen in the next year, will allow for the community to get much of what they are asking for along with whatever they have planned for future content, not necessarily dlc, to improve the game. If they truly want this game to last the ten years as they promised the, dinner they drop last gem the better chance they have at keeping their promise and having people still play the game.
-
I had this thought - you can store like 1000 Pokemon why not a 1000 weapons ?
-
Edited by GameBroJeremy: 7/31/2015 7:20:20 PMWell. 1. Game Freak is not Bungie and Bungie is not Game Freak 2. While you can hold Pokemon in a PC, it's not a game like destiny. Destiny is a huge FPS/MMO like game. Pokemon is a smaller RPG game so it's less complicated then Destiny. Destiny has so many other factors it has for coding a vault space that shares between 3 different characters. 3. If you really want more storage in Pokemon, then buy the PokeBank app for 3DS... 4. Never bring a Nintendo video game into a comparison argument or complaint for a game not published by them... Don't get me wrong, I love a good Nintendo game. If Bungie could do a better job with storage, that would be great.
-
Even worse that you still had more storage space on Pokemon Red and Blue for the gameboy color.
-
Lmao bump
-
Ouch i felt that for bungie. Lol
-
-
[b]GO PIKACHU!!!![/b]
-
Edited by echoblammo: 7/31/2015 12:51:22 PMScrew Pokemon. Its just a perverted game where you force gay-looking animals into balls and force them to Fight and -blam!- each ther