{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
8/6/2016 5:07:35 PM
73
Never have; never will. That man should never be president.
My vote's with Hillary. She's not perfect, but out of the two she's more likely to win and more closely represents my views.
English
-
So you support a wall-I'm sorry, a fence?
-
Why are you even bothering with these people? They don't care about facts.
-
[quote]Why are you even bothering with these people? They don't care about facts.[/quote] I can tell but it's fun lol
-
It makes me sad tbh. Not like it matters, Trump is tanking his campaign and is way behind.
-
Reagan was the same before he surged Plus, major polling establishments are polling up to 10% more democrats than republicans and have changed their poll methodology midrace That has never really happened in a major polling establishment. Third party polls which predict elections with the same accuracy and reliability as major polls place Trump ahead And, in most major polls, Trump is within the margin of error
-
Every source I check has Trump behind. Would you like to link something that corroborates anything you're saying?
-
https://www.longroom.com/polls/ Its methodology has stayed the same since inception
-
Edited by Flailing_Weasel: 8/7/2016 7:50:21 PM[url]https://www.reddit.com/r/NeutralPolitics/comments/4w6gbu/longroom_polling_how_accurate_is_it/[/url] This kind of compiles most of what looking into that site suggests. Personally, I'm not going to trust its numbers.
-
>when you post from a liberal site Anyways, normal mainstream polling is now placing Trump within the margin of error
-
Implying I only checked one site. You can do some basic research on it yourself if you want. Personally, I don't like to trust anything without doing my homework first. Bye.
-
Going to sites like Reddit and Motherjones isn't research
-
Edited by Flailing_Weasel: 8/7/2016 9:58:50 PMAgain, I never said those were the only sites I visited. You can do your own research, but I doubt your bias will allow you to come to any other conclusions than the ones you already have. You can keep trying to insult me if you want, it's not like it will change anything.
-
Where did I insult you?
-
Edited by Flailing_Weasel: 8/7/2016 10:11:41 PMMeh. Assuming I did poor research isn't much of an insult. Though I do take slight offense that you would assume I only use liberal sites.
-
Are you an SJW, perchance? You're reaching for insult
-
Edited by Flailing_Weasel: 8/7/2016 10:34:46 PMNow you're really trying to insult me. I'll admit that wasn't really the best call for me to make. But let's not let one slip spoil the entire discussion.
-
I am asking an honest question. Do you identify as an SJW?
-
Hm. It seems this discussion is dead in the water. If you really must know I think the social justice movement trivializes real issues. I think they disrespect survivors of crimes like -blam!-. I think they are insecure and afraid of different opinions. Like I said, I admit it was an embarrassing slip. But let's not call out the mobs with torches and pitchforks over it ffs.
-
Too late. [i]Burn the witch[/i]
-
You can't burn someone alive like that.
-
Not with that attitude, you can't! [spoiler]10 points to Slytherin if you can name this historical event[/spoiler]
-
Edited by Flailing_Weasel: 8/7/2016 11:16:04 PMHonestly I don't know, but I'm going to guess burning Joan of Arc. [spoiler]I hope I make Slytherin proud.[/spoiler]
-
[i][b]10 POINTS TO HOUSE SLYTHERIN[/b][/i]
-
Under breath: suck it Potter.
-
I would like to direct you to [url=https://www.fanfiction.net/s/6913309/1/Wet-Shower]this[/url]
