#RIP solo players2017 :(. Destiny 2 is supposed to be a new game created as a sequel to destiny 1. Something better... Than destiny one. However why do we only have 4v4s and like 2 different medals! This completely ruins the montage scene. Let's get those 6v6s back and running so that people can have fun. Sure. Competitive is 4s. Fine. Good. But don't ruin the game before it's even out.
Edit: we're trending! Glad to see other people want a larger more casual game mode! Over 900 replies! WOW...
Edit: lots of toxic bs is floating around these parts. Please follow my example and keep it clean and respectful. #6v6 at release! Upvote this and we may see it!
Edit: you could have 10v10 and it wouldn't lag any more than a 3v3. Look it up, it's common sense. Also, with 4s only, every game mode will be trials 2.0 full sweat. I want a more casual playlist where there aren't 150% try hards.
English
#Destiny
-
4 Replies4v4 wouldn't be so bad if they made it completely competitive. But still no dedicated servers...that's the fukc up right there.
-
11 RepliesI'm sure 6s or some kind of big team games will return with a DLC later on. Granted though, the game should be releasing with them.
-
Edited by Hitchenson: 7/17/2017 1:20:56 PMNo, it's not (RE: topic title); anything that makes D2 a bit more Bungie-era Halo-esque, I'm on board with. Who is to say BTB-types of modes won't be weekend/weekly playlists ala Mayhem in the future, anyway?
-
While I am sad to see 6v6 go... there is nothing saying it won't come back later. Also.... you are wrong about medals. The recent PvP vids from IGN clearly show medals are there.
-
Who cares about montages? Like really? Yeah I''ll stick with my 4's. No downgrade at all.
-
Maybe 4v4 will give a fast and better matchmaking !?
-
If D1 started off as 4v4 originally, people would [i]still[/i] be complaining if D2 was the one to introduce 6v6.
-
Wait to play it before you give criticism..
-
Maybe one 6v6 game type, like Big Team Slayer from Halo, but 4v4 is nice IMO. I'd also like Doubles and Rumble to make a return. For the Crucible playlist, have Big Team 6v6, three 4v4 gametypes (one Slayer and two objective), Rumble, and either Doubles or Skirmish (3v3). That'd work nicely, I believe.
-
The medals aren't gone..
-
-
Half bump. Yes and no. We should have a mode that has 6v6, but all regular modes should be 4v4
-
Stop complaining. In 6s, how many times did you drop in and no one on your team played the objective, guaranteeing a loss? Your just as likely to get pubstomped in a 6v6 as you are a 4v4.
-
2 RepliesHave you played it yet?
-
[quote]Edit: you could have 100v100 and it wouldn't lag any more than a 3v3. Look it up, it's common sense.[/quote] [quote]Edit: lots of toxic bs is floating around these parts. Please follow my example and keep it clean and respectful. #6v6 FTW[/quote] [quote]Please educate yourself until you have the mental capacity of a 3 year old before you go on long rants about hate and violence![/quote] Is why you can't be taken seriously...
-
this thing ^
-
Is it really. No one is thinking of the extra benefits that can spawn. If 12 player is the current max and we are going to 4v4 who's to say we will not see 4v4v4 at some point. I think a 3 team match would be awesome. I know some of the games I used to love from halo 2 was the multiteam battles where it was like 6 2player teams.
-
1 ReplyAlso the fact that a lot of teams who run raids together (6 players) are now going to have to remove 2 players if they want to run a few crucible games after the raid, meaning more players feeling left out. It's a bit strange considering bungee has said fireteams are very important in destiny 2.
-
4v4 isn't always competitive just like 6v6 isn't always fun most of the time I go in 6v6s I get match up with whole teams and they destroy completely so where is this fun you're talking about?
-
Stop crying and complaining lol. Thats all you ever do huh, appreciate the game the developers made for one time jesus this community is dumb. You don't belong to the destiny community if you can only complain..
-
Couldn't agree more!
-
1 ReplyWho wants 6v6!!!
-
2 RepliesCall me old school, but 4v4 is the way to go in my books. Never had any issues with it in halo, don't foresee any issues now either. I am a bit disappointed that if they are going to 4v4 though, there is no big team battle. That was one of my favorite modes to play in halo and just good around to chill out.
-
7 RepliesI prefer 4v4. 6v6 is way too chaotic. No one plays with a sense of structure and just run off on their own like in Call of Duty.
-
1 ReplyI didn't know they got rid of medals I enjoyed shaxx yelling at me getting me hyped.
-
7 RepliesI agree. No one asked for 6's to be removed. I'd guess a vast majority of the community preferred 6's.