{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
5/7/2016 12:07:06 PM
21
For cod fans
-
Battlefield 1
-
2 Replies>expected fish >leaves disappointed
-
They were all shit.
-
The only good Call of Duty games to me were, Bo1, Mw, Mw2, CoD 3.
-
1 ReplyI used to fish cod for a living but then they put that goddamn moratorium on the fish stocks.
-
Ghosts- Most generic, unexciting boots on groundd cod ever AW- Terrible jetpack system, too fast paced Black Ops 3- Halfway decent game with good movement system.
-
Black ops 3 treyarch zombies all other options immediately invalid.
-
1 ReplyWhoever did not pick Black Ops 3 is an idiot
-
2 RepliesGhosts: - Actually really enjoyed the SP and thought the story & characters were pretty good. Bonus points for using Bravo Nolan's genius and including the Plane Scene. - Multiplayer was slow and had some features that I didn't really like. It wasn't all too bad, though. - Extinction only served to amplify my misanthropy. What part of "use only melee attacks" was so hard to understand? Advanced Warfare: - Didn't mind the campaign and quite liked Irons. Overall, an alright experience. - Multiplayer was fun until it got hit with the SBMM hammer. Plus, the fact that we were using old as shit guns in 2050 was baffling. Needed more sci-fi. - Never played Exo Zombies so I can't pass an opinion on that. Black Ops 3: - Single player was ok. The story was forgettable. Had a lot of interesting mechanics and gameplay features that, unfortunately, never made their way to the MP. - MP was bland and formulaic. Treyarch, when offered an opportunity to innovate, decided to fall back on familiar, tired premises. The Specialists were especially boring since they didn't really have much of a difference or defined roll between them. Still a fun experience, though. If you can stand the connection and match times. - Zombies was a little over complicated. To the point where the Easter eggs took over the primary objective of kill zombies and survive. Still disappointed that BO3 shipped with 1 map instead of BO1's two.
-
I'm a barramundi man myself
-
Ghosts: Don't remember too much about the campaign, but it was decent. Multiplayer was pretty good. Extinction was actually my favorite part of the game, and I personally liked it much more than Zombies. AW: Don't remember anything about the campaign. Multiplayer was fun for a while, but eventually I started to really despise it (and they ruined my throwing-knife-like lethal with that spike ball shit). Didn't play too much Exo Zombies, but I didn't really like it. Blops 3: I've only played the first mission of the campaign, so I don't have an opinion on it yet. Multiplayer is pretty good; similar to Blops 2, which is probably my favorite multiplayer of the games. Zombies, I've played twice. Like I said, I've never really enjoyed Zombies, and this one is just as convoluted as the others.
-
Advanced Warfare - Decent campaign. Subpar multiplayer. Black Ops 3 - Horrible campaign. Subpar multiplayer. Mediocre zombies. Ghosts - Excellent and enjoyable campaign. Terrible multiplayer. Let's all just pretend Extinction never existed. I'd have to give the edge to Ghosts or maybe put it right next to Black Ops 3.
-
I like CoD more in #Gaming.
-
2 RepliesGhosts was the last good, non futuristic game. No gay wall jumping or anything like that, plus the graphics were good and it was fun.
-
This poll has only one option
-
I don't have any, but black ops has a cooler name
-
Modern warfare
-
Edited by TadPaul01: 5/7/2016 3:02:37 PMNone of the above. Wait sorry I'm not a CoD fan, wrong place
-
I still really like Bo3 tbh. I know a lot of people dislike it, but I honestly enjoy playing it. Plus there's always Dank Matter to grind for in the multiplayer.
-
1 ReplyAt of all the ones you can choose you choose the three shittiest ones.
-
Black ops 3 is the only choice. It has -actual decent- zombies.
