{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
5/1/2016 5:35:38 AM
99
What do you prefer: skill based matchmaking or connection based matchmaking
I'm sure this will be proof for bungie that we want connection based matchmaking
-
1 ReplyWow, talk about a biased poll. WTF is your problem and Good choice following the options respectively The only people complaining about SBMM are the ones who used to stomp on not so skilled players and are now watching their precious K/D ratio get annihilated by players that are on the same skill level as them. The rest of the human race will continue to play the game cause they're having fun (like the devs intended).
-
2 RepliesSbmm it's great because it's killing this barely disguised cash grab run by greedy lying scumbags.
-
8 RepliesSkill based because I'd rather fight people my skill level and make me work for that win not just pub stomp noobs. Unlike most people I don't want my wins handed to me on a silver platter. I've also haven't encountered a single red bar lagger
-
1 ReplyEdited by Aerios: 5/3/2016 8:56:11 PMSkill based. The people I play against aren't missing thumbs and can actually provide a challenge or I can get some practice against decent players. The connection is fine for me.
-
5 RepliesKids think that sbmm is a problem when they HAVE NO -blam!-ING IDEA. Kids with 1.1 KD'S think they have it bad with lag. 1.0 is average. Obviously more average players are going to be near you. For us top 5-1%... lmao don't even say anything about sbmm if your avg.
-
1 ReplyTI ALLL OTHER CLASSEZ BESIDE HUNTERZ ( best ). YOUR DONT KNOW WHAT HUNTERS FIGHT FOR..WHATS IN THERE HEART AND WANT. They are toughh abd will stab U in youR titanz head helmet and then TaMe itt off and destroy iT in frOnt of Your own eyez .. HUNTERZ want to stalk and jumP on its preyz. Seriously they r the best x1000000. In ToO the otHeR day i AlOnE....snipedd 3 enemies w my 1000 yard ownAgE.. my lfg teanates chanted for 10 minutez sTrAiGhT. I AlOnE maDE them quit x 100. My clan are Jelous Of mY sniperr style. Yep, I have 3 hunters wich makes me hard core to thr bone. Get gud skrubzzz. Get oN mY leVel kidZzZ. HATE it that kidz stilll plaey this gane. Get oFf youR mothers back and dads leg and Do beTtEr skrubzzz. Fyi. Kys.. get gud scrubsz.
-
2 RepliesIm not a very good pvp'r check my stats, but im happy with getting stomped as part of CBMM. The game will be better with mo lag, ill improve over time as im pushed by the better players.... And getting that kill on the guy who has ended my last 12 lives is all the sweater...
-
Edited by Dinkabird: 5/3/2016 8:48:40 PMIt should first be connection based and then be narrowed down from there with skill based
-
Honestly it needs to be both but connection should take priority
-
3 RepliesConnection based, I hate playing brazilians and Mexicans consistently, especially when they're lagging.
-
Ranked crucible Crucible. That's all we need. Solves all the problems
-
I would prefer a ranked system tbh. But I will settle for both cbmm and sbmm with a priority to connection.
-
Skill based is unplayable. I'd prefer getting my butt kicked as long as we all have a good connection.
-
Edited by KannibalKlown: 5/3/2016 8:13:17 PMIt's a tough answer... On one hand, it sucks if a couple of newbies get pitted against an elite fireteam. Winning might not be a requirement for fun... but getting steam-rolled before you can get a single kill the entire match is also not fun. On the other hand, lag ruins things on soooo many levels. I'd rather play against a superior force than one that's just cheating. Personally, my ideal algorithm is A) Track average ping during the past X matches (to flag lag switchers) B) Group the the 36 people with the closest ping C) Split the 36 people into 3x matches by kd ratio (or whatever skill matcher) === 12 people with similar pings and scores / kd's in the same ballpark Ping would be the dominant factor. But then you try to split the elite from the newbies.
-
Private match on pvp needed
-
Idfk, I never had more problems with one than the other so I never understood why people were complaining so damn much.
-
Depends. They should have a SBMM ranked playlist where you could see your rank and the rank of your opponents and team. They should also have an unranked playlist with random people. But both of them should prioritize CBMM, with a maximum ping and packet loss, and not go outside that maximum. Then kick people who go above that maximum for 5 seconds, and kick people who go above it for 10 seconds total, but each time is less than 5 seconds.
-
I think it should be connection based for regular crucible and a little bit skill based for trials and IB. Honestly I only get lag in IB or trials 1/10 matches.
-
I just don't like playing people my skill level
-
8 RepliesBefore SBMM you could lose 12 games in a row in IB. With SBMM it is rare to lose more than 3 in a row, with 2 being the most common for the last 2 IB's. Maybe you are now playing against more fair competition so you don't feel as 'good' as you thought you were?
-
1 ReplyI don't mind the new matchmaking. I used to do pretty bad in crucible- I probably averaged a little under 1.0 k/D most games and would never be near the top of my board. Now most games I'm well above 1 and I find I can actually be competitive. It's making me like crucible more since I'm seeing some success. As a result I will play it more and I'll slowly get better and better. And that means if sbmm works I'll keep going against better and better people slowly, learning at a pretty good curve. It's great for people like me.
-
Edited by Akron: 5/3/2016 5:20:09 AMIt will never be perfect as long as we are on a p2p system, but damnit other p2p games do not have the issues this game has. Hire some better network engineers or something. In the meantime, matchmaking priority should be as follows: connection>connection>skill These issues are absolutely ridiculous for a AAA game in 2014-2106. Destiny 2 better have dedicated servers. Any reason Bungie tells us for not having them is a copout. We should not expect or accept anything less than stable connections on dedicated servers in a AAA game in 2016. Reply
-
I think connection is more important, but skill-based would help people like me (who is bad at PvP) improve in Crucible. I don't like a game where I always lose the gunfights due to the shotguns. Freakin' shotguns man.
-
I just want games to happen faster. I get tired of waiting 10 min for the next game to start.
-
Watch
-
Id like both tbh. I don't want to be paired against jhon doe who's been grinding the game since year one and hasn't seen light of day for that long either. Id like to be with a group (on good connection) that is matched to my skill so its challenge be it a victory or a loss. Rather than coming out victor in 3 minutes or loser in 3 minutes due to bad skill matching because of connection Not to mention. I STILL get paired with guys on my team and the other that are red bar warriors. So I haven't see much change. Can't be my con either, I run over 100 on dl and ul speed
