{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
3/23/2016 7:54:24 PM
9
First off so we can tax it
Seconded because too many youth are getting their lives destroyed because they possessed marijuana
English
-
They are getting their lives "destroyed" because they knowingly broke the law, how the -blam!- can you even attempt to use that ?
-
Edited by Bloom Unknown : 3/24/2016 4:40:37 PMOk then let's ban everything you do and see what happens. I am sure you are fine with gun owners who say that even if the second amendment was abolished or reinterpreted by the Supreme Court that they would willingly break the law. The law that criminalized marijuana is unjust, ineffective, and hurts us more than it helps us, not to mention the reasoning behind the law was a complete lie and fabrication. Can you understand that you dumbass?
-
You obviously miss the point, marijuana wasn't lawfully made illegal while these people were young, it's been illegal so they knew full well they were breaking the law. Your comparison is -blam!-ing ass backwards it isn't funny, taking something away isn't the same as saying something that wasn't legal is now (according to the law) illegal. You truly are a -blam!-ing moron.
-
Your argument is ridiculously stupid. You are saying don't do anything illegal even if you know the law is wrong. Well I guess the American Revolution was wrong since they knew full well that what they were doing was treason, I guess slavery was A-OK because the law said so. Man, you really take stupid to a new level. What a dumbass sheep that can't decide wrong and right for himself/herself.
-
Again, you're a -blam!-ing idiot. Never did I say it's right or wrong, but when you KNOWINGLY break the law, you deal with the consequences. Funny you bring up the revolution, cause they knew full--blam!-ing-well what would happen if they didn't succeed (just like when you break any arbitrary law any -blam!-ing where). You're such a -blam!-ing moron it hurts.
-
You have no concept of law or else you would agree that the punishment must fit the crime. It is unjust, seems you agree, so what is your point anyway?
-
You act as if people are going to jail and serving long sentences for first time offenses, and that is rarely the case if ever. The ones who get harsh, seemingly unjust, sentences are repeat offenders. The point is, if you're going to knowingly break a law, you can't claim to be a victim just because you don't agree with the law you broke. We all have choices, so either choose to not break the law, be smart enough to not get caught, or accept the consequences if you do get caught.
-
Edited by Bloom Unknown : 3/25/2016 3:41:31 PMMany are serving long sentences for first time marijuana offenses. The laws in many states are extremely strict. Many of these laws are being changed precisely because of citizens are realizing how detrimental these laws are, whether they are possessing marijuana or not. The awareness of the situation has been heightened by people breaking the law. Obviously people are facing the consequences of breaking the law, really there is no choice. Our conversation picks up after that. My argument has been that the consequences do not fit the crime, in fact there should be no consequences. Without people breaking the law the realization and change might never come. While you are facing the consequences you have the right to due process which includes judiciary review of the law. You trying to frame this as complaining is foolish. Look at Prohibition. The breaking of unjust laws is inevitable and rightful, and our system of legislation and adjudication almost rely on it to some extent in certain cases.
-
Exactlyyyyyyyyyy
