{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
Edited by UGL13RTH4NU:
12/31/2015 2:42:49 PM
260
Hey dumbasses! It's called control; not capture.
Tired of dumbasses in IB running in a circuit capturing zones; only ever really controlling 1 Zone. If you and your team have 7 or 8 captures each because you've done nothing but run a circuit capturing a Zone you're not bad-ass objective oriented. You're bad at controlling the 2 zones we need to win. This is not a track and field event.
Rant over.
Edit: edited original post for clarity. People seemed to think I was talking about triple capping and not lack of controlling 2 zones.
For those commenting about how it's just a game and they're there for fun. Where I come from losing isn't fun. The game can be lost and you've still had fun when you have a great back and forth battle, but losing to dumb shi[b]t[/b] is not fun. Your the type of player that thought it was "fun" to capture A on Blind Watch and Shores of Time. Nuff said.
-
Reversing the spawn! FFS
-
-
I usually finish games with the most captures and we win a lot. Is that a bad thing that I cap zones? [spoiler]I get what you mean. I'm just messing.[/spoiler]
-
I actually got a PM from a guy calling me, and I quote, a "-blam!- Campero" because after my team had taken two points I would crouch and hang around B defending it as they would swarm it.
-
I agree but when you're on a team of randoms and all of them go for the trip cap instead of trying to control at least 2 it's time to relax and just get kills until your friends jump online
-
1 ReplyYeah but 3 zone captures and kills with lock down gets you more points....
-
It's pointless to attempt logical discourse with the vast majority here. The neural networks in the frontal lobe of most players on this forum are not fully functioning yet due to their age. It happens around 26-28 for females and 28-32 for males. My point is: They don't argue to win, they argue to not lose. This is why there is no linear logic, just circular bullshit.
-
1 ReplyOr when 5 people are capturing A, and you go to B and the other team has C and they have 3 going to B... Turns around, where are the other 2 guys helping me out?....
-
Honestly, if you can't hold all three objectives then your team sucks and has absolutely zero coordination.
-
2 RepliesEdited by Supernugget64: 1/3/2016 3:34:55 PMHad that happen last night, would not control just capture, got our asses handed to us, but what can you do, I am 1 of 6 I said hell with it, tried holding but when they come around 4 or 6 deep you haven't a chance. So yeah it sucks big time!! Peace Out!
-
1 ReplySome people are just interested in doing their bounties.
-
3 RepliesTo win you just need kills, the zones help make it go faster but are not required for winning
-
*captures the 3rd zone
-
8 RepliesAgree. Apparently all the K/D junkies aren't aware that your kill score gets a boost for each zone controlled at the time of the kill. The people actually capping zones are boosting the scores. Just like people running past zones that are being capped. 5 people in the zone gives the TEAM 5x the score. Just selfish players is all.
-
Edited by Necrucian: 1/3/2016 3:01:08 PMI've been noticing this a lot more this IB. So I started taking the initiative to go straight to B cap defend then change spots to either A or C. I have seen a lot of avoiding B altogether because it's harder to defend, but that's where most of the good battles are. Why bypass B to Cap the outer flags and split the spawn for your team..it's terrible a terrible strategy unless you need to relieve one point of enemy and split their team to make them defend their original flag.
-
6 RepliesF*** control in Iron Banner. I just hope they never do control in IB again.
-
1 ReplyWell some teams are able to control all three zones
-
Yesterday I had a game with a 2.33 KD and 8 captures, and guess what? We won by 7,000+ points!
-
2 RepliesSo is the thing that you hold when you play the game, yet unless you hold it all you don't have "control" The name of the game is irrelevant, your post is somewhat valid but don't be calling someone a dumb ass because you don't understand English.
-
You know. Your right. Your team scores more points per kill for each control point you have. While I will admit that pressuring then to go back for their spawn control point is a good idea, because it forces them to focus on taking it back instead of attacking. Ultimately holding two points is more important than roaming kills.
-
1 ReplyIt isnt a rant. You're telling the truth. So many dumbasses play thos game its atrocious
-
3 Repliesi agree ,many pass capture to go kill ,dont keep capture ect. this> [quote]but losing to dumb shit is not fun. Your the type of player that thought it was "fun" to capture A on Blind Watch and Shores of Time. Nuff said.[/quote] do not agree 1 name calling not necessary ,2 A sometimes becomes a good detraction or counter to the change of normal tactics. which recently has been effective aka everyone runs to B slaughter house
-
1 ReplySorry Adolf.....
-
4 RepliesI will continue to do so just to piss people like you off :) [spoiler] capture=points Kills=points My points > yours I win = you lose :)[/spoiler]
-
1 Reply"Capture the zones!"
-
People run on past the first control point just to get killed giving the opposing team more points leaving you less points. Gg
