From ur mum lel
-
2 AntwortenLame title change. 3/10
-
1 AntwortenI believe maybe.
-
How dare you! *Froths at mouth.* *Dies.*
-
No I forget how it happened tbh but I know the basically... (Wait for it) there was an explosion of shit. Wouldn't that mean that there was something already in the universe before the Big Bang, then? If that stuff came together then that stuff actually came before the Big Bang. So how could it create the stuff that created it?
-
2 AntwortenI find it really interesting that many people do not know that the Big Bang wasn't truly Big Bang, the phrase was just coined indignantly by a scientist who did not like the idea. In actuality the Big Bang was a singularity which for a reason unknown to modern science began to expand at a rapid rate an, as far as anyone can tell, it hasn't stopped yet. It's just amazing though to think that before the time of the Big Bang there was nothing, not even time and then all of a sudden there was something, and began to occupy what wasn't there.
-
Where is the "I don't know" option?
-
14 AntwortenYes. Examining the ratio of baryonic matter (Hydrogen to Helium to Lithium) in the present universe sets an end point to what ~13.7 billion years of stellar fusion would have produced. Tracing back this fusion through current rates and predicted past rates yields a primordial ratio of the same matter that matches what would have condensed from the quark-gluon soup that would have existed in a post-inflationary universe. Furthermore, observations of the microwave background radiation also match the energy levels of electromagnetic radiation produced during the photon epoch, the period of time in which electrons could "cool off" to enter orbitals of nuclei thus being capable of emitting photons, if said electromagnetic radiation experienced red-shifting at the rates at which we observe stellar masses all the way up to high-energy galactic nuclei at further and further distances. Once more, the sizes of the smallest globular masses not observed to experience gravitational collapsing in the background radiation that existed at the same point in time mentioned above matches predictive models based on the -wait for it- same ratio of baryonic matter predicted to exist from present day measurements and fusion rates. What a magnificent scientific circle.
-
No it was me. Yeah I read the tags but I made the universe so, OBEY
-
It is a theory and I do not say yes or no because with our current knowledge and resources the human race is still incapable of truly knowing how the universe began and hoe life was created.
-
Every theory is just that a theory. A theory at best is the thing left over after we have proven everything else we think could happen wrong. It does not mean that we have thought of the right thing or every possible answer to the question or that we were even asking the right question to begin with. However this is as close as possible to not being wrong that we can currently achieve. And just because we like something to be or not to be true does not change the fact of its truth or falsehood. Take this game destiny some love it some hate it and some love to hate loving it but all have a reason and a theory for it. Some may be wrong some right but who gives a dame play the game if you want to or find one you a different game to play if you must but the truth is in the playing not the theory. [spoiler]did you like the part about the butterfly? It gets me every time and brings a spent shell to mind.[/spoiler]
-
2 AntwortenBearbeitet von crazeddoctor: 11/23/2014 5:04:59 AMyes, and no. the big bang was just an expansion of the universe, it was already created but just not as large
-
16 AntwortenIt was proven wrong. Some scientists found something in space that was older than "the Big Bang" so it's not real
-
Bearbeitet von Legend To None: 11/20/2014 8:32:29 PMWell the Big Bang was the result of something that happened. But created the planets and stars. I like how Cosmos explained it, great animation in that show. A question no one may ever know. The biggest mystery and creates a sense of wonder in life though. How nothing can become something.
-
2 AntwortenWhy are people saying no? It's a pretty well established theory. I thought this was like a unanimous thing.
-
4 AntwortenBearbeitet von TunnelSnakesRule: 11/16/2014 10:34:02 PMI feel like Michael Bay created the Big Bang Theory. "How do you think the Universe was created Mr. Bay?" Michael Bay:"An Explosion!"
-
Oops, wrong button. Anyway, it's not fact at the moment. It's just most likely the case.
-
I guess it makes the most sense but it still doesn't make sense, and it hurts cause I have to know everything!
-
2 AntwortenI think the Big Bang is responsible.... But the question is: what was behind the Big Bang? [spoiler]I know there's several theories and I have my own. There's a nice YouTube video out there, but I can't find it.[/spoiler]
-
2 AntwortenI believe it did, and it's not the first time. The universe is growing then imploding which draws in all the energy before exploding into a new universe.However being Rasta I believe that Jah created the universe and controls the cycles, who created Jah I don't know, and I doubt I'll ever find out, but that's cool with me
-
3 AntwortenIt's impossible to find out the true origins of the earth but I believe in God and that he made it.if he didn't then how is the world so detailed.??
-
2 AntwortenBearbeitet von Atticus: 11/16/2014 9:44:07 PMUntil this approximation to an answer is proven null or wrong by another more accurate theory, I will believe it. So yes.
-
7 AntwortenIts all theoretically there no facts yet soooo trick question
-
It's a theory but it's more logical than a magical entity lol
-
No, it was a big floaty wizard man with a beard and magic stuff. [spoiler]Jeez, some people are just stupid.[/spoiler]
-
Maybe the big bang. Maybe God. At this point I don't know.
-
1 AntwortenCan I vote that I don't know and neither does anyone else