{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
7/14/2014 7:45:58 PM
24
About the holocaust: Say instead of 6 million Jews
Hitler killed six million Hindus instead. How would Hitler be perceived today? Would the holocaust be talked about as much?
Give your opinion
-
Bearbeitet von Uncle Putin: 7/16/2014 11:32:24 AMUm... yes? It wasn't such a big deal BECAUSE they were Jews. It WAS a big deal moreso than the other mass slaughters out there because it was the brain child of the most dangerous person in the world, a person trying to take over the world and trying to destroy every single nation out there. Of course it would get more attention. Pictures of it were at the forefront of the media because it was what Hitler was doing, our greatest threat to peace at the time. It had nothing to do with them being Jews. The reason murderers like Mao, Stalin, Pol Pot (is that how you spell it?) didn't get as much attention is because they weren't necessarily threatening world peace. They were just destroying their own little corner of the world. Doesn't make it right that we give the Jews more attention but the culture of the media and the state of the world at the time around these mass murders dictates that the public paid more attention to the Jews. Again, why is this? Because the same person who was killing millions of Jews and other undesirables was also trying to take over the -blam!-ing world. He was our closest and most dangerous threat. That's why we paid attention to what he did.
-
It's hard to believe there was six million Jews back then.
-
If we're getting to the point of why the emphasis on the Jews being killed, I'd say it's due down to the fact that Hitler above all else, seemed to hate them the most and that's one of the reasons he's remember so much.
-
Probably.
-
2 AntwortenMy friend blames the Hews for the Holocaust, and says that if they weren't there it wouldn't have happened... :/
-
3 AntwortenYou make a good point. Over twice that number of Chinese died at the hands of the Japanese and there are no movies about that. When there are, its about the white people who witnessed it.
-
1 AntwortenOver 10 million died with Mao so...
-
Probably not. Countless time I have seen people cry crocodile tears about the holocaust.
-
Considering people rarely point out the other 5 million people that weren't Jews that were killed in his camps, I'd say that they wouldn't.
-
Just as horrendous.
-
1 AntwortenHitler was a great man. We need more leaders willing to make the sacrifices he made, and capable of creating the solutions he created. #HitlerForCommunityManager2015
-
7 AntwortenIt was 6 douviginitillion, you filthy anti-Semite! Reported for insensitivity.
-
4 AntwortenWho is Stalin?
-
People are people. It would have been the same thing.
-
4 AntwortenNobody makes movies about Germans slaughtering 26 million Russians.
-
Bearbeitet von LowIQPlayz3445: 7/14/2014 8:25:03 PM6 million killed is 6 million killed. Jews, Christians, Hindus, atheists, doesn't matter. 6 million dead is a tragedy.
-
5 AntwortenBearbeitet von K1lLL ST3AL: 7/14/2014 8:10:43 PM[b]6 million killed[/b] should be the key statement here, not Jews. OT: I'm not sure, but I would hope so.
-
Bearbeitet von Choopie: 7/14/2014 8:12:53 PMProbably not in our world but in there world yes.
-
8 AntwortenBearbeitet von Gary: 7/14/2014 7:51:18 PMProbably not. No one really talks about the Armenian genocide, so why talk about Hindus? The Jewish people pumped up the jam on it all, and they keep bringing it up every chance they get, so naturally it'll get talked about a lot.
-
1 Antworten6 MILLION SIX (6) MILLION 6,000,000 JEWS JESIX MIWLLON JIX JEWS 6 JILLION J6WS E MILLION JEWS MILLIONS OF SIX JEWS JEWS SIX MILLION
-
It would be the same.
-
2 AntwortenYeah, I think that people would talk about it just as much.
-
Holocaust - 6 Million Jews False Information Detected Ratbat Eject! OPERATION: Investigation.
