True, I have spend a lot of my life studying. Is that such a bad thing?
English
-
No, I never said it was. I just said if you spend more time with school, you have less time for other activities.
-
Yeah, you have a point there. Luckily I was a relatively good student so I still had quite a bit of spare time during my studies. I had and still have a pretty great social life, but I've never been much of a sports guy.
-
Dw, PSU is jelly.
-
Jelly of what?
-
That he's got life made.
-
I doubt it. I mean, I make 30k less than he does but I'm 6 years younger. I also probably have about 10x more life experience than he does just because of how much time he put into school. I am jelly of his 2 masters because I'm working on my a masters right now and its hard as shit.
-
Well, your assumptions are completely baseless, to be honest. My brother had an NCAA scholarship and is currently averaging 92%. He has it well made, too. He's popular and gets [i]tons[/i] of pussy. He studies and plays high level hockey, and had the social aspects of life you refer to as "life experience." Who is to say Display isn't in some sort of scenario with similarity?
-
I dont really see how your "brother" relates to the guy who has 2 masters degrees. Also, I really hope you arent being serious. Why would anyone talk about their brother like that? Too funny. And FYI. NCAA Hockey isn't "high level hockey".
-
[quote]I dont really see how your "brother" relates to the guy who has 2 masters degrees.[/quote] Because he manages hockey, social life and school. [quote]Also, I really hope you arent being serious. Why would anyone talk about their brother like that? Too funny. [/quote] I [i]am[/i] being serious. I'm close enough with my brother and I'm comfortable talking about those sort of things with him because that's how my parents raised us; to be open and honest with each other. [quote]And FYI. NCAA Hockey isn't "high level hockey".[/quote] Actually, it is. Unless you consider NHL "high level". Then, yes, it's not high level. But for an ordinary hockey player, NCAA is high level hockey.
-
[quote] Actually, it is. Unless you consider NHL "high level". Then, yes, it's not high level. But for an ordinary hockey player, NCAA is high level hockey.[/quote] No, its not. Anyone who is good goes to Canada to play Juniors. OHL, QMJHL, WHL I have literally played 2 years of ice hockey when I was under 10, and they tried to get me to play for Penn State. Its not high level.
-
Really? I guess you know everything. /sarcasm I live in Canada. Everyone who had a shot either plays in the Q, the OHL or NCAA. NCAA is the most desirable level to play because you et education and hockey. Scouts for the NHL also look at NCAA over the Q or OHL because the players are generally smarter.
-
[quote] Everyone who had a shot either plays in the Q, the OHL or NCAA. NCAA is the most desirable level to play because you et education and hockey. Scouts for the NHL also look at NCAA over the Q or OHL because the players are generally smarter.[/quote] Granted, the NCAA is a decent place to play as a last resort. Thats fine. But come on. I work for a god damn NHL team. In no way does any team look at the NCAA players as "smarter". And its absoutley not the most desirable.
-
Hm. Maybe my parents always pushed us towards NCAA because of the scholarship? I don't know. Given the opportunity, I would go to NCAA for the education. I actually have a few buddies who play in the Q. They love it. Off topic, what team do you work for?
-
[quote]Hm. Maybe my parents always pushed us towards NCAA because of the scholarship? I don't know. Given the opportunity, I would go to NCAA for the education. I actually have a few buddies who play in the Q. They love it. [/quote] Dont get me wrong, No matter where you can play its a great experience. And yeah your parents are smart for pushing education. Thats the most important thing. [quote] Off topic, what team do you work for?[/quote] I work as part of the marketing team for the New Jersey Devils.