I mean CryEngine has existed for like 6 or 7 years now so I’m doubtful to say the least but I’m open to seeing what it can do. Thoughts?
English
#Offtopic
-
3 AntwortenYeah "cutting edge" and will most likely ship with less content than Halo 3 Nobody cares about the technical talk. We want to see gameplay.
-
4 Antworten[quote] “The Halo engine is a very technical, engineering-focused engine. It’s super hard for creatives to work in,” Ross said, “It’s super hard for a lot of creatives to work in, at one time. We did a ton of work, on Halo 4, on the engine, to get it to look… I think it looked amazing for being on the last generation on the last year of the platform.[/quote] But Halo 4 looked like trash. The only reason anyone might’ve been confused into thinking it looked good is cuz they went blind from all those obnoxious and unnecessary lens flares. Halo 3 had better textures ffs.
-
Everyone says their own stuff is the best.
-
Cryengine sucks, there is a reason they went out of business. Looking [b]decent[/b], and thats why Crysis looks at best these days, doesn't make up for how horrible it is to implement for every other system in the game.
-
9 AntwortenI don't really care what the software is. I expect it to be better than the predecessor because that's how things evolve in gaming. What I am more interested in is this statement; [quote]Described as a “spiritual reboot” of the first-person shooter series, which launched in 2001, the game’s also in development for Xbox One and PC.[/quote] I don't know what exactly that means, but if it does bring back the older version of run & gun, play style as opposed to OP armor perks, super op guns, and no more self spawning vehicles whenever you like then I'm sold.