{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
Bearbeitet von HammondAerospace:
2/1/2017 12:46:56 AM
42
Remove range and stability perks in Destiny 2
In my opinion this what is causing so many problems. Perks that add range and/or stability are just straight broken.
Bungie designs these guns to be balanced with the stats they are made with. 3 shot scouts have no stability, and fast firing pulses have massive kick. But then you slap on a few stability perks and WHA BAM! You've got yourself a sniper.
Range perks on hand cannons make them snipe people way out of their range.
Remember the doctrine? Ever use that gun with no upgrades? It sucks, the reason it was so good was becasue of the added stability.
People complain about shotguns because of added range perks.
This game would be a whole lot easier to balance if people couldn't just abuse the range and stability perks on guns. Just please Bungie, think about just leaving the perks at things like Crowd control and outlaw. Stuff that doesn't change its base stats.
[spoiler]Main account is LaminateAbyss90. Its currently forum banned because I called someone a scrub :/[/spoiler]
Edit 1: Apparently people think that my idea will ruin the guns.... Guess balance ruins the game guys
Edit 2: This idea is for DESTINY 2! Not Destiny 1. READ THE TITLE!
Edit 3: This community is so dumb... People think I'm complaining about dying to people... I am not! I know people are better than me, I knew that before everyone reminded me... AGAIN.
Edit 4: I'm glad some people are nice enough to tell me why they like or dislike my idea.
-
Please. Hell, get rid of all the perks except the main ones. 90% of the gun issues in the game are caused by the middle tree.
-
2 AntwortenHandcannons snipe now? Good joke, bud. Even with Rifled Barrel their effective range is only around 31 meters(33 with Rangefinder). Handcannons haven't been able to snipe since House of Wolves. [spoiler]and let's not even mention ghost bullets[/spoiler]
-
1 Antwortenand add damage and firerate perks Full damage HC Two shot in your face :F
-
3 AntwortenAnd destroy 90% of the weapons huh. You are one of those participation trophy kids or "if I can't get it nobody should" whiny crybabies. Muted.
-
3 AntwortenPerfect balance is what makes things dull, boring and unimaginative. Sorry it does. Freaking mundane. The challenge and fun is finding out how to counter or beat the other guy. Not go crying about it being unfair.
-
D2: The Mighty Ducks (also known as The Mighty Ducks 2) is a 1994 American sports comedy-drama film directed by Sam Weisman. It is the second and penultimate installment in The Mighty Ducks trilogy and it is a sequel to the 1992 film The Mighty Ducks and produced by Walt Disney Pictures, The Kerner Entertainment Company and Avnet–Kerner Productions. In the United Kingdom and Australia, the film was titled The Mighty Ducks (the first having been titled Champions and subsequently, on home releases, as The Mighty Ducks Are the Champions).
-
3 Antworteninstead of removing the perks they should give each archtype of weapon a set of specific perks that it can roll with. for example, fast rate of fire weapons should still get stability and range perks, but not as strong as low rate of fire ones. not to mention that high impact weapons should stagger and flinch oppents more / stronger than fast rate of fire weapons. however autos for example should get different "main" perks than pulses. perks that make them excel at their roles instead of having almost all perks on every gun possible. for example, fast firing autos are supposed to keep an enemy suppressed, forcing them into cover or something like that. so give them a perk that increases the dmg of each bullet the longer you shoot at the target or something similar. experiment and create variety based on that. maybe even slowing enemies down if you keep shooting at the enemy for a set amount of time / hit a certain amount of bullets. having more useful and desireable perks to chose from instead of the typical "max range, stability" setting would greatly benefit weapon variety and people would experiment more and find their own play style. removing is the wrong way, the game will only become dull. its already dull and most people (not addressed to you) want things nerfed and make the game even more boring. balance doesnt always mean only nerfing or removing. after all, removing shot package didnt solve anything. the problem for shotties for example are still the small and cluttered map designs with only a few mid-open areas and the fast player movement speed.
-
3 AntwortenI don't really like this idea. There are some guns that have worse base stats than other guns in the same archetype. Also, some guns NEED those perks to be viable, like bullet hose autos, as those have a bad base stability and range. I just feel like removing those perks wouldn't balance things at all. If anything, it would make things worse.
-
7 AntwortenI can see your point but it f they did that they would have to remove about half of the perks in the game. Which would probably cause them to have to create new perks which might be even more OP than before. Just my thoughts on this.
-
7 AntwortenYou do realize that removing perks makes every gun the same. And less reason to play the game. The only reason ppl play this game now is to farm weapons WITH PERKS NOT FOR ITS LACKING STORY.
-
28 AntwortenGo play COD or overwatch is you want standard guns with no perks
-
9 AntwortenOn your mark, get set, terrible!
-
9 AntwortenI don't know why people continue to want things [i]removed[/i] from the game. So many things have been removed at this point and the game has just become stale.
-
5 AntwortenYou ask for people's opinion and then you trash them with your edits? If you don't like the answers, don't ask the question and quit acting like a child when people give you logical answers...
-
1 AntwortenOne of the best ideas I've heard in a long time for this unbalanced turd
-
6 AntwortenRemove anything that "increases/decreases handling". I have seen nothing describing what "handling" is.
-
7 AntwortenI agree with you. I'd prefer all weapons base stats to stay the same. I would also like to see all weapons with a set elemental damage. Then we all could resist specific damage types with our armor and help negate trendy meta weapons.
-
1 AntwortenI understand where you're coming from with this idea and I kind of agree and disagree at the same time. Yes these perks are very advantageous on some weapon archetypes, i.e clever dragon, matador. But and it's a big BUT, weapon perks are one of the main factors that separate destiny from most other shooters. They could just tone down these perks in destiny 2 but to get rid of such things would just make this call of duty.
-
10 AntwortenThis isn't a very good recommendation
-
1 AntwortenRemove Destiny 2. Sounds like a deal.
-
1 AntwortenThat might actually be a good idea.
-
4 AntwortenI respectfully disagree and dislike your idea.
-
1 AntwortenI was just walking and the front of my big toe felt weird and with each step as I continued to walk I could slowly feel my toe creeeping threw a hole in my sock untill it completely penetrated it and is now all alone in the rugged terrain of my boot while his brothers are all cozy in the comfort and safety of my thick warm sock. It's a rather sad story.
-
3 AntwortenI like how Titanfall 2 does perks for guns. Increased reload speed, more ammo, different scope, etc. All guns allow you to choose the same perks, and they don't drastically affect gameplay. Pretty balanced compared to Destiny.
-
2 AntwortenThis guys complaining probably because he has crappy rolls
-
2 AntwortenI died so f you bungie BALANCE YOUR GAME WAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH[spoiler]wahhhh[/spoiler]
