{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
9/16/2016 9:45:31 PM
36
Death of a Vanguard
So this may be a stretch (especially considering the voice actors are somewhat fan-favorites) but with all of this virus situation taking place, I feel like we may lose one of the Vanguards.
They want us to avoid the tower (which we all know won't happen) to contain it from spreading to more people. I'm willing to bet one of them contracts the disease and must be eliminated.
Even if I am wrong, I still think it would make for a compelling story arc, and a perfect way to kick off the narrative of Destiny 2.
Thoughts?
English
#Destiny
-
4 AntwortenBearbeitet von TheMediocreThor: 9/17/2016 3:34:22 PMHere's a darker theory for why they could kill the Vanguard: They can get cheaper voice actors. You think Nathan Fillion is cheap? You think Emmy Winner Peter Dinklage was cheap? No. It's easy to kill established characters and buy cheaper voice actors for new characters. It's also probably a good reason why The Speaker hasn't has new lines since vanilla. Bill Nighy can't fit into the budget.
