So there is a tactic out there that irks you and you have trouble countering. I get killed by SC less than by anything else. But instead of rising to the challenge by adapting your skills, technique and loadout to overcome and persevere, you come on a public forum and beg the game devs to make things easier for you, thus rewarding you with a hollow victory. All this while the majority of us just carry on and make due. Ladies and Gentlemen, I give you the Age of Entitlement.
English
-
Bearbeitet von bLooM_pHaZe: 9/1/2016 3:18:14 AMIn my case it has nothing to do with not being able to counter it. When comparing SC as a melee, it is a OHK...! Honestly, that's fine with me under almost ANY situation and, I really don't mind if either I'm killed by a noob using it or when a player uses it in a skilled manner. Only so long as my Warlock melee or ABILITY can do the same thing...OHK without any, ANY preconditions.
-
Makes sense to me.
-
The precondition for SC is that run straight at the opponent and give up your ability to shoot . I'd say that's a pretty high risk looking like harmbe out there. If you can't deal with an ape running at you in a straight line you shouldn't be playing PvP.
-
Bearbeitet von bLooM_pHaZe: 9/1/2016 6:15:55 AM[quote]The precondition for SC is that run straight at the opponent and give up your ability to shoot . I'd say that's a pretty high risk looking like harmbe out there. If you can't deal with an ape running at you in a straight line you shouldn't be playing PvP.[/quote] Wrong...kind of! To think that shows a lack of understanding of SC. The is no requirement of SC that dictates one to "run straight at the enemy"! The only precondition is that you...RUN (!) and in any direction. In fact an enemy need not necessarily even be there to initiate it, by chance I could OHK some schmuck even eyeing the F^ ING door lol. Now I can stop running at ANY time to shoot or nade if the other player is unable to predict my movements or intentions, doubtful but 'thems the breaks'. [quote]You're actually dumb[/quote] Whose dumb now fuktard...lol.
-
You cant scream entitlment on everything. Bringing up balance issues no matter how silly isnt entitlment mentality. If anything itd be defeatist but its still not that entitled would be "Bungie I cant get no land beyond. Ive played 4 whole days and still havent gotten it. Increase the drop rate or I quit"
-
Bearbeitet von bLooM_pHaZe: 9/1/2016 6:19:34 AM@ Fusion: Agreed.
-
While you may be right, why not ask to bring the other classes back up? Nerfing them is what exposed the Striker in the first place. We were mostly ignored until that nerf. I never felt that The Hunters or the Warlocks needed a nerf and I will always support strengthening to find balance instead of weakening. Picture the guy that tries to level a table by eye with a hand saw. He winds up with a flat board when all he needed to do was shim the short leg.
-
[quote]While you may be right, why not ask to bring the other classes back up? Nerfing them is what exposed the Striker in the first place. We were mostly ignored until that nerf. I never felt that The Hunters or the Warlocks needed a nerf and I will always support strengthening to find balance instead of weakening. Picture the guy that tries to level a table by eye with a hand saw. He winds up with a flat board when all he needed to do was shim the short leg.[/quote] I like the cut of your jib matey, your thought process is OP. Nice.