{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
Bearbeitet von Carmine100:
4/23/2016 9:35:32 PM
62
Halo reach is better than halo 5 AMA
Uh oh
[spoiler]hides in anti 343 fanboy bunker [/spoiler]
English
#Gaming
-
Reach got a great forge world map. Still play today
-
I agree. I thoroughly enjoyed Reach
-
Not wrong So far only thing going for halo 5 is the climbing up ledges feature
-
Reach Firefight was the best part. Reach multiplayer was garbage. Reach Forge was immaculate. Reach Campaign was immaculate. 5 Firefight is okay. 5 multiplayer is the best part. 5 Forge is hard but very good. 5 campaign is garbage. Yeah? Yeah.
-
The golden age.
-
Reach is great all around while Halo 5 is only good for arena (not including Warzone it's terrible)
-
2 AntwortenI just can't understand why people loved reach so much. I could not stand the multiplayer, it ruined Halo for me until 4 came out. The only cool thing about the multiplayer was being able to buy equipment, but I want going to play that awful game just for that. The bloom with the dmr was the worst thing I've ever seen from Halo. IMO reach was the absolute worst Halo, I had more fun with spartan assault. The campaign was pretty decent though.
-
So if someone says they like Halo 5 more they are a 343i fanboy? Hm, interesting.
-
Halo 5 has to be one of my favorites actually. However, Halo 3 will forever be the best in my opinion.
-
I like arena in Halo 5, but everything else sucks
-
1 AntwortenTotally agree, sir
-
Every HALO is better than 5. I'm not so sure about Halo 4 tho
-
-
Reach's campaign was better than halo 5's. Halo 5's MP is better in my opinion.
-
I personally really like 5's multiplayer but reach is probably better
-
The only things Reach has over H5 is a slightly better campaign and more gametypes. H5 shits on Reach in every other department.
-
All up to your opinion man.
-
tbh the only thing Reach has over Halo 5 is the Armour art style is the best in the series, whereas 343 can't do Spartan Bipeds for shit. That and the cancerous dynamic spawning is at least limited in Reach as opposed to Halo 5's spawn kill-encouraging sack of shit. The Sabre mission was pretty dope too. Halo: Reach's canon-breaking story is almost as bad as the story direction in Halo 4 and 5, the DMR is basically the only viable non-power weapon in the sandbox, vehicles are made out of wet tissue paper and every game's outcome hinged solely on who was hosting at the time. Not to mention Armour Lock being the online equivalent of a pause button that forced the attacking player to retreat or risk being overrun by the entire enemy team, no exceptions. Let's not even get started on the absurdly bad custom games in DAYZ and Assassination Tower where cringe-tier roleplaying went down along with the slowest matches in videogame history. How they're the most popular gametypes I will never know.
-
Its multiplayer and forge were trash compared to 5s, the only thing reach has on 5 is forge canvasses, invasion, and custom games. And when infection is added to 5, it'll have better custom games easily
-
1 AntwortenBearbeitet von RedEcho: 4/24/2016 1:08:39 PMReach was Bungies final "Screw You" to Microsoft.....pointing the franchise in a direction which took away good MP mechanics and added Bling for the kiddies. Why they did not allow you to prestige and put diamonds on your Plasma pistol is beyond me.
-
Halo 5 is one of my least favorite lol
-
I'd probably play halo 5 if they made a game mode with no sprint or other abilities.
-
2 AntwortenWhat does ODST stand for?
-
Reach is not better than 5.
-
I don't think very many people will disagree.
-
3 AntwortenBearbeitet von Hobokin: 4/24/2016 7:41:39 PMSure, but you can't deny that Halo 5 was a step in the right direction. They just need to add the following: Better forge maps, playable elites, add back old forge controls, Custom file share search, FALCON!!! Anything I missed?
