{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
10/31/2015 7:59:13 PM
2
Right...considering you're either a moron or lazy I'll forgive that comment. I'm thinking both, and since you don't seem to have enough intelligence to look it up yourself I've included a link. It's a little more complicated that what I was trying to say, so if needed I can dumb it down for you.
http://www.technologyx.com/featured/understanding-frame-rate-look-truth-behind-30v60-fps/
English
-
Bearbeitet von mcclean94: 10/31/2015 8:44:11 PMI'll just comment again since clearly I know what you're misinterpreting. You just made it more complicated by being a pompous ass over a post about frame rates. The eye [i]can[/i] see more than 24fps. But can the eye [i]comprehend[/i] more than 24fps? No. The eye can distinguish between motions, but each frame past 30fps is rationally blurred. Your eyes piece these bits of information together at a [i]maximum[/i] of 24fps [i]despite the fact[/i] texturization changes past that, making the images seem more fluid. But as for 30fps being slow? Hell no 30fps isn't slow. Anyone who claims that doesn't know how to rationalize between realism and what tech has been able to provide us. Again... [i]30 different images in a second.[/i]
-
Bearbeitet von mcclean94: 10/31/2015 8:36:08 PMWhat are you misunderstanding here? How about state what you think I'm saying so I can clear it up for you. Clearly your mind got stuck on something. Forgive the comment? Lol? Anyone who calls anybody a kid makes themselves look like [spoiler]a kid. Or a dumb teen who has issues with their parents.[/spoiler]
-
My mistake...guess I shouldn't call you a kid. Obviously you're an uneducated egotistical prick....have a nice day. ^.^
-
Sure thing asshole.
-
I will be generous and explain why you are so wrong. First the eye does not see in fps...it's more complex than that. At average there is speculation that we can see around 100 or so fps...but as the eye doesn't see in fps it's speculation. Soap operas are filmed in a higher fps to give it a more realistic look, which is used to get the audience to connect to characters more easily. While our eyes only perceive around 100 fps our brains can process much more...hence the complexity of it. If you hadn't been a self centered prick I would have been more than happy to have explained this...and of you had clicked the link I posted we wouldn't have gone so low as name calling. Next time know what you're talking about befoe someone much smarter puts you in your place. [spoiler]and that is check mate.[/spoiler]
-
Bearbeitet von mcclean94: 10/31/2015 9:38:31 PMOf course the eye doesn't see in frames.. Mother of God man we have a pretty close opinion.. Only you deem 30fps as slow by a gaming standard I deem 30fps as a baseline standard where anything below is visible and choppy. But of course you can't see through that - you're the type that likes to be an opposition that's why you've been here for so long. -blam!- off dude. Also I read your link. I got to 1. The eye can only see 24fps. That is a [i]MYTH[/i] but instead of questioning my stance, you took the time to insinuate. Grow up dude. Maybe instead of picking false battles online you can go try to make some friends. Much smarter? You don't know diddly shit about me bud. Now please enlighten me as to what I'm "so wrong" about. -blam!-in tool.
-
Wait...I think we are arguing for the same side...anything below 30 frams is terrible...
-
Bearbeitet von mcclean94: 10/31/2015 10:01:57 PMThere is a broad line between comprehension and observation. We observe the passage of frames, but cannot comprehend each movement. Comprehending each frame is as pointless as trying to measure light. We're limited, but the tech isn't. That said I'm longing for tech that goes past the use of frames. Maybe with a type of liquid. If you've never seen ex machina I suggest you check it out. Their brain concept is relevant to this. Sorry for the saltiness but the struggle to convey a point is real. You can disagree with somebody without being on the opposite side of the spectrum. I just wish people didn't go at it so aggressively with this "lul u stupd" approach. [spoiler]Jaeger is -blam!-ing delicious btw. It's cool if your name is about that I'm a stoner anyway. [/spoiler]
-
Which has been what I was -blam!-ing saying...
