{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
9/20/2015 8:28:43 AM
103
Why isn't "Christian" America taking more Syrian refugees?
America takes 10,000 while Germany takes 500,000. For a war America helped start they should be doing more.
Purse, out.
-
1 AntwortenWhy does anyone even reply to purse nowadays
-
Why the hell would they go to America?
-
Well isn't Germany like over there
-
1 AntwortenRefugees can run to Germany. Ever tried running across the Atlantic? Easier to just get to a neighboring, or at the very least close country.
-
Noiseless, you and I do not agree on A LOT, but on this topic I am 100% with you. This is something that has put me at odds with people who claim to be Christian. It is Christian duty to help those who need it and these people who have been driven from their homes in fear for their lives certainly qualify.
-
America never said no but it's a long way to go and they won't get paid benefits for doing nothing
-
Because most christians dont read their bible, if they did, they probably wouldnt be christians
-
Some "Syrians" are not actually Syrians....
-
Germany is closer.
-
[quote]America takes 10,000 while Germany takes 500,000. For a war America helped start they should be doing more. Purse, out.[/quote]
-
Getting involved in problems of less evolved nations has never worked out well
-
I'm more concerned with where the refugees will go once they go to germany.
-
Are you referring (1)to the Christians in America or (2)assuming that America is a Christian nation? If 1, then, people that claim Christianity and say they know what it means to be Christian but obviously don't as many religious people are selfish and twofaced If 2, then, America is not a "Christian nation" despite what many outsiders (even insiders) assume. We many Christians yes, but not a Christian nation. I will be pissed if we ever make any religion "our religion." Irregardless of that, we still have a ton of selfish and twofaced people that preach kindness and shit but that's as far as it goes.
-
Bearbeitet von Beer: 11/8/2015 9:55:03 AMWhy are the majority of them Syrian?[spoiler]Full blown derp mode activated.[/spoiler] [spoiler]Letting them in without proper screening. = Welcoming terrorists with open arms.[/spoiler] Also, Germany is much closer. [spoiler]This issue started long ago in a galaxy, far, far away, called Derptastica.[/spoiler]
-
Nobody wants em
-
America isn't Christian. That's why.
-
No, we shouldn't be taking any refugees. Germanies poverty and crime rate are gonna rocket. Most of them ars muslim. And we already have enough illegals here!
-
You realize Isis terrorists are among the refugees right?
-
Lmao sure ok
-
Too many racists here. They'd be better off in germany
-
I thought the plan was 100,000. Also, Germany's closer to Syria.
-
Send them to camp refoogee.
-
1 Antworten>Refugees If they were refugees they would be just -blam!-ing happy staying in Turkey/Jordan/literally any of the dozens of nearby countries without ongoing armed conflict. These aren't refugees, they are migrants.
-
1 AntwortenBearbeitet von DB5: 9/21/2015 10:58:29 AMThe US has been involved in it but the US didn't start it. Mr Assad did when he used the Shabiha to murder his own people in the streets. He also invited ruin when he courted jihadists throughout the 2000s. That said, I agree countries should do more to take in refugees. Let's start with KSA, because they've taken in literally no one.
-
3 AntwortenLinking al Jazeera? Really?
-
1 AntwortenHurrrrrrr! if we git muslims, we get all bad 'n stuff! screw teh starvin kids we need moar christians!
