[quote]I've seen a few others post about this on the forums as well, but they tend to get dragged down by the toxic or plain negative responses. [/quote] I think its more than fair to question the extent to which the game should reward people with superior experiences in terms of gameplay quality for insisting that an inherently competitive mode be based around not wanting to improve. Because even with the removal of SBMM, that's still what we have now and it's set up this way to cater to people who, for whatever reason, demand the right to place first on the leader board at the expense of others' gameplay quality. I personally think its wrong to have a mode where so much effort is already put into catering to the kind of player that you represent and then to also add the requirement that matchmaking works in such a way that it guarantees you first place. At a certain point its just unfair to say that people in the upper middle tier of "skill" should be the only ones who have to face people who are better than them often, and oh yeah, they should have to do it with little to no shot registration and slower character movement than what is given to the top tier of players. Just as an example. I play control a lot, and the amount of people who either don't know or don't care that the majority of maps are designed so that you lose if you don't hold zone B is astonishing. Should the game be programmed to where it just says okay, this simple characteristic shouldn't be adapted to and instead we should design the game to where all these people are put together while also giving another group of people barely playable matches because that's the way competition should work now? Its simply not good to approach PvP with a mindset that it needs to cater to people who refuse to even do the most basic things. It causes a lot of problems for other people and just because some people don't know or don't care shouldn't mean that they take priority in terms of gameplay quality.