This is a repost since a mod tried to cover up another Bungie blunder to avoid accountability from the Lore community: their last leg of support.
The comic contradicts the in-game lore.
The way the game's lore presents it, the meeting where the decision to banish Osiris already occured, in the lore tab for [Curse of Foresight.](http://www.ishtar-collective.net/entries/curse-of-foresight)
>Consensus Meeting 2891.98
>NM: "I note for the record that we are without a Warlock Vanguard or a Vanguard Commander."
>Andal Brask: "Two birds, one man."
>Zavala: "Ikora Rey is interim Warlock Vanguard for this meeting."
>Speaker: "Which brings us to our first order of business. Ikora Rey, the Consensus formally requests you assume the responsibilities of Warlock Vanguard."
>Ikora Rey: "Considering I've been performing those responsibilities for a while now, I accept."
>FWC: "Why did you cover for him for so long?"
>IR: "Someone had to do it."
>S: "Ahem. Now that we have Consensus, I may inform you I have decided to banish former Warlock Vanguard Osiris from the Last City."
>[murmurs]
>S: "Are there any objections?"
>DO: "None here. Maybe he'll find a better planet for us."
>[pause]
>S: "Very well. Next: I name Titan Vanguard Zavala as the new Vanguard Commander. Congratulations."
Osiris isn’t even present at his banishment.
So which is it Bungle?
Is the comic canon or is it the in game/grimoire?
Does your left hand not know what the Right is doing?
Continuity out the window.
Edit: also, Ikora is the one who lead the banishment of Osiris too?
IR: Sagira, I know we didn't leave one another on the best of terms...
S: You led the group that exiled my Guardian. I didn't like it...but...people weren't ready to hear what Osiris was saying back then.
So, Bungo, who banished Osiris?
Edit: they’re trying to cover up this -blam!- up by putting it in #feedback instead of leaving it in #lore.
Reposting in Lore again.
Why all these contradictions and inconsistencies?
English
#lore
-
3 AntwortenJust playing devils advocate for a second, but is it possible at all that it's actually the comic that is the much discussed/tweeted 'folklore'? The over-the-top dictatorial master orator The Speaker with his baying bandwaggoning 'everyman' lazy stereotype crowd? Whilst Vangaurd royalty raises barely a murmur? 'tis the comic which is folklore imo. [spoiler]My other thought (quickly dismissed but still fun for a minute) was that the writing was a deliberate transition back to the original story when the Speaker was evil or at least a Machiavellian sort of character. Traveller is evil theory back on the table?[/spoiler]