{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
11/14/2015 8:14:15 PM
12
Believing in a god is no different then believe in a theory.
Neither can be proven by science, and neither can be disproven.
Everyone needs to quit trying to act like they know more about it than the next person. You don't, you can not prove your point beyond a shadow of a doubt.
So stop trying, and stop acting like you are better or smater than the next person. You're not.
Neither can prove it.
Done.
And to who ever say evolution is proven, then why is it still called a theory of evolution? Because it fails the scientific method, that is why.
So just get over it.
English
-
Look up the definition of a scientific theory.
-
scientific theory is a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world that is acquired through the scientific method and repeatedly tested and confirmed through observation and experimentation. When has evolution been observed? And name the scientist. And don't say Darwin. He merely observed birds on islands and related the differences of the same species of mainland birds. He observed adaptation, and guessed at evolution.
-
Adaptation is evolution.
-
Wow u really are clueless. Evolution is one species evolving into another. Adaptation is a species changing it's physical form, or actions to conform to the environment that it is in. Like a squirrel stealing food from a bird feeder, that is not a natural behavior. Only urban squirrels do that. Pull a wild squirrel from the Forrest and it will not instinctively do that. That is an adaptation, not evolution. Evolution would be the squirrel changing into a bat, so it could fly up and get the food from the feeder. Now has anyone ever in history observed this to happen, or are they guessing that this happens? Don't say flying squirrel, that is still adaptation. It is still a squirrel, not a whole new species.
-
Well for starters, your definition is incredibly flawed. You can't define a word using that same word in its definition. Adaptation is totally evolution. The organisms changes so as to better conform to its environment. Those that can't adapt die out, removing their traits from the gene pool and leaving only the improved forms. These changes build up over long periods of time until the adapted species can no longer breed with the original. At that point, they are considered two different species. And guess what? The driving force behind that was [b]adaptation, natural selection, and mutation.[/b]
-
God hates you. Just saying.
-
I thought he was all-loving
-
They only unforgivable sin is denying his existence.
-
So he's not all-loving.
-
Nope. I never said he was. Preachers say that. Not me. Nonbelievers go to hell. You'll see.
-
Transforming. Is that better; but technically evolution and evolving are two different words. One is an adverb and the other is an adjective. Do you need the definition of those words, so you can fully understand?
-
Look up the definition of theory.
