Which game company is the worst, EA or 343 Industries?
English
#Gaming
-
Honestly? I have no problem with EA. 343? Well...Halo doesn't give me the same feels so I think you know what I think of 343
-
I luv anniversary and halo 4 but crysis is also and amazing game and but halo has a lot more players so i have to go 343 just cuz i like halo a lot.
-
3 RepliesEdited by Feralheart: 7/26/2013 2:28:12 AMI will never forgive EA for what they did to Mass Effect. And contrary to other peoples' opinion, I enjoyed Halo 4's campaign, a LOT. It introduced a different rhythm/pace to the game and a better focus on character development rather than plain action. Although I will say that the music guy needs to be fired fired fired fired fired fired
-
EA is a shitty publisher. At least 343 has been improving Halo 4 since its release.
-
2 RepliesEA but only because they make you buy online passes.
-
7 RepliesEdited by DragonzZilla: 7/25/2013 11:28:00 PMWow. Bungie.net must really hate 343 to compare it to EA.
-
13 RepliesYour comparing a publisher to a developer? Also 343 has done nothing wrong at all. You haters are an illogical bunch of cry babies that didn't get your Halo 2.5. Get a bloody grip.
-
14 RepliesEdited by The Random: 7/25/2013 11:40:56 PMAs much as I dislike EA they're not the ones responsible for putting Halo on the road to disaster, Microsoft is. Seeing as 343i is affiliated with Microsoft and that they are just plain stupid, I say 343i is the worst.
-
9 Replies343 Industries EA has been around for a long, long time and over the course of their history, they've financed some pretty good games that I've had a lot of fun with. 343i, on the other hand, is a frankenstein "developer" created by Microsoft purely for the purpose of milking the Halo franchise (which has been dead since the release of Halo 4) of a few more bucks.
-
5 RepliesLOL you're comparing a company that just takes your money and gives you nothing in return to a company that has made one original game since it's creation which you happened not to like. Quit making shitposts that do nothing but whine about 343 and Halo 4.
-
2 RepliesFor -blam!- sake you idiots. EA is a company run by -blam!-ing ass holes who rip people off, have horrible PR, purposely cause controversy, rehash sports IPs, and destroy studios. 343 made a game you didn't like. You know nothing about ethics for comparing them.
-
Oh that's easy -blam!-ing EA
-
2 RepliesA publisher vs a developer?
-
They aren't comparable but always EA.
-
3 RepliesHonestly, the only good "game company" these days are Naughty Dog, Bungie, Blizzard, and Namco.
-
EA DEFINITELY
-
I can't say yet. One game is hardly enough to judge an entire Company.
-
1 ReplyAs much as I love EA for bringing back Star Wars Battlefront, they're the worst. DRM Online passes DLC for the sake of DLC Any company that makes Halo is good. <3 343
-
-
5 RepliesOk so we're comparing a publisher which has published a lot of games to a developer who has developed one game. Makes sense.
-
343, ea dutcifysurcs
-
-
343 is nowhere near bad. EA rips people off for their own purposes.
-
28 RepliesEdited by Inyaccurate: 7/26/2013 1:00:09 AM343i is merely an infant in the industry. They have much to learn, and I think they are capable of doing so. They have made improvements in the soundtrack quality in their games, as seen [url=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gm0YB3uKfk8]here[/url], and they have gone onto tweaking Halo 4's multiplayer into a better experience. EA, however, is a money whore. They've sullied the name of Bioware and Mass Effect 3. They are [url=http://consumerist.com/2013/04/09/ea-makes-worst-company-in-america-history-wins-title-for-second-year-in-a-row/]quite literally[/url] the worst company in America (twice in a row).
-
3 RepliesIsn't EA a publisher though and 343i a developer?
-
EA has done unforgivable things.