{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
9/30/2015 6:28:22 AM
1243
If Trials 290 Minimum Bungie Getting Sued
Yr 1 non upgraders literally paid for it, not to mention other locked out content
English
#Destiny
-
101 RepliesEdited by ShoulderGuy420: 10/5/2015 8:19:08 PMYour case will never go to trial..... Because trials require 290 light.
-
Paid for year one. Thus is year 2. You ain't paid for shit.
-
Do it. You wont. Pussy
-
Why would you want to do trials if you are lower then 290
-
Read the agreement you signed when you purchased the game and content
-
Don't worry, triald will be delayed again with the new tether glitch... damnit!
-
Sep 30
-
Almost fell for the b8.
-
He has ttk what a troll
-
This is year 2 ToO not year 1 ToO soooooooo they didn't pay for it they just lost content they previously had. I guess you could say their subscription ran out
-
6 RepliesEdited by Mmm Poo: 10/5/2015 11:37:05 PMI really dislike when people say literally when it's not necessary. Also, how will year 1 non-upgraders get the money together to sue when they can't afford ttk.
-
-
-
I mean, no – because if they installed the update and accepted the Terms of Use, any case will get laughed out of court.
-
U do realize even if year 1 could play trials they'd get rekt right? Lvl matters.
-
2 RepliesWould you rather get pwnd by our op guns you are too poor to purchase? Or do you prefer not bothering at all.
-
Hey guess what? It'll be taken login exclusive. Brother vances stuff has the taken king symbol, most likely meaning it's ttk exclusive
-
-
Wish it was 300
-
Regardless, you signed the liscense agreement, which states they can deny content at will. You aren't the first to say stupid shit like this in the forums, and the EULA always shuts them up.
-
What are you smoking?
-
Smoke some more man
-
Stand in line behind their former employees.
-
Have fun losing.
-
1 ReplyIt says recommended. Nobody knows if that's required. Using this logic you would sue them for not letting you do the raid if you haven't even done the story
-
Have fun, especially since to play in the first place you had to sign off a terms of service that said they can remove whatever content they want. Would it be morally questionable? Maybe. Would it be legally wrong? No. And you just wasted a ton of time and money to find that out.
