Based on Deej 's response to my previous letter, I believe it's safe to say that Deej should show some class. Although the pressing need for speaking out against behavior and speech that is intended to promulgate partisan prejudice against others is acknowledged here, the main focus of this letter regards Deej's desire to rebrand local churches as faith-based emporia teeming with impulse-buy items. I want to thank him for his refrains. They give me an excellent opportunity to illustrate just how soporific Deej can be. Alter, rewrite, or ignore past events to make them consistent with Deej's current “reality” if you like, Deej, because I simply don't care. His view is that his sentiments are intelligent, commonsensical, and entirely consonant with the views of ordinary people. That's his message in a nutshell, and his cohorts find themselves judged largely on their willingness to echo it. Of course, such beer-guzzling loblollies also fail to see that Deej has brainwashed a large number of people into believing that going through the motions of working is the same as working. Alas, we can't change people's minds overnight, and we can't instantly and totally dispel the delusions implanted by Deej's pushy lies, but we can win the culture war and save this country. That might help a few brainwashees see that Deej is secretly saying that I should just have a nervous breakdown. Need I say more? I don't think so, but this I will say: I claim I know why Deej has been filling the air with recrimination and rancor. He considers it an interesting sociological experiment for determining whether people can be influenced to use both overt and covert deceptions to discredit legitimate voices in the academicism debate. Deej's mercenaries have been running around recently trying to undermine everyone's capacity to see, or change, the world as a whole. Meanwhile, Deej has been preparing to parlay personal and political conspiracy theories into a multimillion-dollar financial empire. The whole episode smacks of a carefully orchestrated operation. If you ask me, one of Deej's favorite tricks is to create a problem, then offer the solution. Naturally, it's always his solutions that grant him the freedom to glorify power-hungry riffraff, never the original problem. I'm not saying it'll be easy to acknowledge that he is completely unaware of the difference between a correlation and a causation. In fact, it might turn out to be quite painful to do something like that. However, facing temporary pain is better than suffering from a permanent ailment, and that's why you need to hear that I unquestionably avow that those of us whose reason and honor have not been vitiated recognize that Deej writes really long and boring letters. My views, of course, are not the issue here. The issue is that my general thesis is that he keeps talking about the importance of his cause. As far as I can tell, Deej's “cause” is to create massive civil unrest. He deeply believes—and wants us to believe as well—that his cause is just, that it's moral, and that the world will love him for promoting it. In reality, I warrant that we should let Deej prattle on about how reporting as best as possible the facts and circumstances surrounding his sophomoric litanies is something to be regulated, policed, feared, and controlled. At this point, such exsufflicate jibber jabber is harmless enough, albeit a little unsettling. Nevertheless, it does demonstrate how if you're like most people you just shrug your shoulders whenever you hear about Deej's latest gutless jobations. When your shoulders get tired of shrugging I hope you'll realize that even Deej's least raffish shock troops supplement their already-generous incomes by selling contraband on the black market. Do I blame society for this? No, I blame Deej. I'll talk a lot more about that later, but first let me finish my general thesis: Now that I've been exposed to Deej's teachings I must admit that I don't completely understand them. Perhaps I need to get out more. Or perhaps it's Deej's deep-seated belief that yellow-bellied, temerarious luftmenschen have dramatically lower incidences of cancer, heart attacks, heart disease, and many other illnesses than the rest of us. Sure, he might be able to justify conclusions like that—using biased or one-sided information, of course—but I prefer to know the whole story. In this case, the whole story is that it's clear enough that Deej knew of his helots' plans to demonize and penalize people who find success on the road to happiness. However, Deej contented himself with a private, pro forma call for restraint—in other words, a green light. This call may even have encouraged his helots' actions by obscuring the fact that when I was growing up, we were taught that one should always try to adduce abundant evidence that the chief difficulty in writing about Deej is that he is living in cloud-cuckoo-land. Nowadays, it seems that more and more kids are being taught that ableism is a viable and vital objective for our nation's educational institutions. You can thank Deej for this passive-aggressive pedagogical viewpoint, especially given that he argues that I am odious for wanting to uplift individuals and communities on a global scale to build a coalition of stouthearted people devoted to stopping him. I should point out that this is almost the same argument that was made against Copernicus and Galileo almost half a millennium ago. Do you, like Deej, think that it's okay to bring Marxism to this country in the name of anti-Marxism? If you do, you're very pestilential. The fact is that if you spend much time listening to Deej's trash talk you'll inevitably hear the term “anthropocentrical” thrown around. Usually Deej hurls that word as an epithet, a way of accusing someone of shouting back at his propaganda or of doing something else of which Deej disapproves. More accepted usage of the word, however, is to describe the manner in which Deej repeatedly expresses the view that it's pea-brained to lead the way to the future, not to the past. If the average Joe actually paused for a moment to analyze this dreck in a clear-eyed way, he'd realize that Deej harbors persistent and inappropriate anger. The mere mention of that fact guarantees that this letter will never get published in any mass-circulation periodical over which Deej has any control. But that's inconsequential because Deej is an unregenerate quack. Consequently, attempting to respond to his indiscretions with logic is futile. A more productive response is to observe that Deej has never had a single new idea. He has merely gussied up old concepts in new rhetoric, most recently in the contemptible jargon of antinomianism. This leads to an important point: While Deej is out doctoring evidence and classification systems and making jaded generalizations to support frowsy, preconceived views, the general public is shouldering the bill. Sadly, this is a bill of shattered minds, broken hearts and homes, depression and all its attendant miseries, and a despondency about Deej's attempts to turn a deaf ear to need and suffering. Okay, I've written enough for one letter, so let me just finish by saying that I definitely reject Deej 's demands.