{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
4/30/2019 2:35:17 PM
26
Creationism isn’t real.
Sorry religious boys but it ain’t real.
For those of you who say macroevolution isn’t real must not know about these examples:
Grassy Tarweed (madia grcilis)
Brassicas
Maidenhair Ferns (Adiantum pedantum)
Woodsia Fern (Woodsia abbeae)
Malheur Wirelettuce (Stephanomeria malheurensis)
Field Corn (Ze Mays)
Yellow Monkey Flower (Mimulus guttatus)
Fruit Fly (Drosophila melanogaster)
Drosophila pseudoobscura
Drosophila willistoni
House fly (Musca domestica)
Apple Maggot Fly (Rhagoletis pomonella)
Gall Former Fly (Eurosta solidaginis)
Flour Beetle (Tribolium castaneum)
Polychate Worm (Nereis acuminata)
Chlorella
Cichlid fish in Lake Victoria
Bird to reptile macroevolutions have included:
Eoraptor
Herrerasuarus
Compsognathus
Sinosauropteryx
Protarchaeopteryx
Velociraptor
Sinovenator
Beipiaosaurus
Sinornithosaurus
Microraptor
Caudipteryx
Rhaonavis
Confuciusornis
Sinornis
Patagopteryx
Hesperornis
Apsravis
Ichthyornis
Columba
Reptile to mammal macroevolutions have included:
Pelycosauria
Therapsida
Cynodonta
Primitive mammalia
Morganucodon
Hadrocodium wui
Repenomamus
Gobiconodon
Human to ape; examples of the fossils that support this are:
Pantroglodytes
Australopithecus africanus
Homo Habilis
Homo rudolfensis
Homo erectus
Homo ergaster
Homo heidelbergensis
Homo spiens neanderthalensis
Homo sapiens sapiens, Cro-Magnon
Home sapiens sapiens, modern
Pezosiren portelli
Italian Wall Lizard
The cards are down boys. Read em and weep.
English
#Offtopic
-
3 RepliesNo offense but these song lyrics kind of suck, most of them don't even rhyme
-
4 RepliesJoy. Here is this dead spot on the ground where the dead horse was beaten to death, then beaten after death, then beaten after it was gone, then beaten until nothing grew there, then beaten 50 more times because angsty, Edge Lorde wannabe's think they are original. *Sigh, I want to not be bored*
-
Dude, a lot of religions are very pro science. A lot of religions believe in evolution.
-
14 RepliesClassic. Believing that if God is real (and Creationism) than that means that Science must not be. You have to realize that if God is real than He is the God of science. Until you admit that as a point to argue around and not against I can't really argue with you [spoiler]Bumblebees[/spoiler]
-
On a semantic level, the concept exists, so it is real. Jokes aside, yeah you’re right
-
14 RepliesHow did the first organism on Earth that all other organisms evolved from get there? [i]God put it there[/i] My set of beliefs is a hybrid of both evolutionary theory and creationism. It may seem absurd but it makes sense to me.
-
You forgot Charmander, Charmeleon, and Charizard.
-
1 ReplyAnd this proves that we weren’t created…somehow? Evolution is undeniable, we’ve obviously observed it, but I still don’t see how this is the end all to theology.
-
3 RepliesI think the only religious types that still disagree with evolution are the more extreme side. Like Flat Earthers. They're just silly and honestly shouldn't be taken seriously.
-
You’re not real, man.
-
4 RepliesSo you're here to try and convince people to think the way you do. That's fine. So why is it you can't continue a simple debate with me? I want to have a fair debate, sir, if you're able to stay with it
-
2 RepliesPeople whom disagree with creationism are just scared of having the fact that someone is judging you for your actions.
-
1 ReplyEdited by Uncanny_Vale: 4/30/2019 10:57:54 PMLol don’t even bother. I’ve learned from experience that no amount of evidence and reasoned argument can convince someone of the truth if they just don’t want to believe it. The human mind is just a big bundle of biases and beliefs that are almost impossible to dislodge. If someone has been taught since birth that 1+1=3 and their whole belief system and world view is based around that belief then nothing can convince them otherwise. You can show them undeniable mathematical proof that 1+1=2 and it still won’t matter. Creationism is the same. Evidence doesn’t matter. You just have to hope that some day they decide to open their eyes and come to the realisation themselves. Outside pressure doesn’t work. The desire to change needs to come from within. Until then we just need to ensure it stays out of the school system.
-
2 RepliesGot any 4's?
-
Misread as Communism isn't real.
-
The existence of evolution does not necessarily contradict Creationism. You can believe that a world in which evolution exists was created.
-
8 RepliesThat doesn’t mean diddles
-
Checkmate round-earthers, that doesn't mean anything.
-
8 Replies[quote]Pardon my french, but you sir, are an asshole![/quote] [spoiler]not a knock off[/spoiler]
-
17 RepliesUh-huh. Can you give your sources? I'll only consider your "examples" if you can actually say [i]how[/i] they're examples. And also, I have to ask why you felt the need to post this. This is just being antagonizing for the sole purpose of being antagonizing. Nobody can hold a real, serious debate like this.
-
1 ReplyEdited by Ogma: Destroyer of Worlds: 4/30/2019 5:53:09 PMCreationism as an idea, is real. People have to choose whether to subscribe to it or not. I personally don’t because it doesn’t stand up to the scrutiny of logic and reason and when critically investigated, the best creator that can exist is an indifferent one that requires special exceptions. I see no reason to concern myself with such a thing even if it does exist.
-
1 ReplyBut those animals aren’t “links” in an “evolutionary chain” they were each created by God. The fact that some are extinct does not mean they “evolved” into something else.
-
Could creation have happened, and then evolution after it? Yes.
-
I believe in Chaos. [spoiler]no not khorne[/spoiler] Chaotic forces and energies meshing and repelling and generally doing chaos-ish things. And from the chaos random variables combine in the perfect way so as to poop out existence.
-
7 RepliesUmm... this doesn’t mean anything. If you mean that these are supposed to be missing links or something, you’re wrong. For instance, Homo sapiens. Scientists have been trying to find a missing link for hundreds of years, and every single one has been disproved.
-
Whoever said I couldn't believe in both?
