I know Spicy Boy is a total dickbag but I hope he stays. He's freaking hilarious.

Pretty sure he was speaking of it's use in military actions. Hitler had a very bad view of chemical weapons from his WW1 exposure.

More fake news from creative news network

How can anyone have been gassed in a room when the toxicology reports no Zyklon B gas detected? How can there have been Zyklon B gas present when there is no blue staining on the concrete walls? How could the "gas chamber" doors lock people in when they locked [b][u]from the inside?[/u][/b] Fact: Zyklon B clings to surfaces like concrete, wood, plastic, skin, and clothing. Holocaust propaganda shows pipes and vents that dispersed the gas. But anyone knows that Zyklon B takes the form of pellets, which need to be specifically placed next to fans to direct the gas to a mixer which neutralizes the gas in an ammonia base, and takes 24 hours of aeration. After this it takes trained professionals with protective gear to go inside the gas filled room. And even so, the bodies would still have Zyklon B clinging to them, which could kill other people through skin contact who aren't protected. "Survivors" report going in as forced labourers to remove the "victims" only half hour later. There is zero percent chance they would have survived under these circumstances and therefore impossible to be retelling the story. There were four holes in the ceiling which claim to be the ventilation system, but his would have infected all nearby buildings like the hospitals and SS barracks. Sources: Nuremberg documents NI-9098 and NI-9912 For Rudolf Höss' testimony, see: Kommandant in Auschwitz, Autobiographische Aufzeichnungen, eingeleitet und kommentiert von Martin Broszat, 1958, Stuttgart, Deutsche Verlagsanstalt. Notice how in NI-9912 it points out disinfestation, as Zyklon B was actually being used for the disinfestation of the lice epidemic that was going around all across Europe. All the photos of dead bodies all have Typhus symptoms, which is a disease that lice carry. It's been reported that a few hundred to a thousand people were gassed at once. A total of 6,000,000 gassed. Let's be conservative and assume 1000 people every time. So 24 hours, or a full day of aeration per 1000 people. It would have taken 6000 gassing sessions to get to 6,000,000. So a grand total of 6,000 days at least. 6000/365 days per year = 16.438 years. Hitler was in power for only 12 years. How come the Auschwitz death toll was originally 4,000,000, then changed to 2,500,000 from the testimony of Höss (which was obtained through torture), then changed to 1,500,000 in 1989 (the memorial stone was even changed to this number), and now it is estimated at 960,000, yet that 6,000,000 stays the same? How come the number 6,000,000 was repeated a total of 140 times before Nuremberg even happened? [b][u]It's fake news. [/u][/b]http://balder.org/judea/Six-Million-140-Occurrences-Of-The-Word-Holocaust-And-The-Number-6,000,000-Before-The-Nuremberg-Trials-Began.php There were a total of 22 camps. It was originally reported that all 22 of these were confirmed death camps. Now it is reported that only 6 of these were confirmed death camps, yet Zyklon B was found at all of them. Dachau is confirmed not to have been a death camp. But what proof is there demonstrating the existence of gassing at Auschwitz which did not already demonstrate the existence of gassing at Dachau? For many years, a host of "proofs" and testimonies were presented which claimed to demonstrate the reality of those "gassings." It seemed to me to be a good idea to refer back to the proofs and testimonies proving that there had been some "gassings" at Ravensbrück where we likewise know that there were none. Between on the one hand the documents about Dachau (or about Ravensbrück) and, on the other hand, the documents about Auschwitz, there is no difference in quality, but only in quantity. On those first "gas chambers" or on the first "gassings," they have made up stories only during some 15 years, while on the others they have made up stories for 35 years. They claimed there was proof for gassings but later changed their minds, despite having "proof." It is illegal in 17 different countries to deny the Holocaust. The truth should not need laws protecting it, if it were true. Proof for the gas chambers' existence: -Photos of dead bodies (well no shit, a war just happened) -Muh historians -A "Final Solution to the Jewish Question" document that was never found. It was burnt apparently. So who is really crazy? Who are the real conspiracy theorists? The people who make a a gigantic accusation of 6,000,000 kills with not a single shred of forensic evidence, or the people with scientific evidence and the people who use logic? In conclusion, the gas chambers were staged. People were rounded up to work, and many people died to Typhus. Many people also died from starvation, because railroads were bombed by the British and supplies could not be delivered. People did indeed die but there was no deliberate genocide, and the National Socialists do not deserve the demonization the media and Hollywood has done to them. You should also realize that if people were not rounded up to the camps that they would have died anyway by the British air raids on all the German cities. The cities later received phosphorus bombs, also by the British, igniting the entire cities and burning any survivors alive. Hitler did not gas his own people, Churchill gassed every single German civilian. Do your research. "Holocaust" is a Jewish ritual sacrifice which involves the burning of a child. The Holocaust event was named by the Zionists as a way of mocking the Germans who were burnt to death by the phosphorus bombs. They had plenty of motive to create the Holocaust lie: the Zionists finally gained the state of Israel, and they also attempted to cover up the conspiracy of the Jewish bankers that the national socialists exposed. But the truth is resurfacing. You want to demonize the real bad guys? Look at the Zionists in Washington, the Zionists who own the international banks and the Federal reserve, and the Zionist oil capitalists, who still wreak havoc across the world to this very day. Israel was placed in such a convenient location, nearby all the newly founded petroleum and natural gas deposits at the time. Watch this video, and think of these people whenever he says "Jews," and you'll realize how much sense Hitler is making and how relevant his words are to this day: https://youtu.be/kzIRG525l6s A simple video showing nothing more than a piece of history yet Jewtube has banned it in 18 different countries.

Gas chambers are not a weapon. More of a capital punishment means on a grand scale.

Think your confusing Hitler with Himmler

Technically he is correct. Zyklon B was originally formulated (in the 1920's) to be a pesticide. The technical definition of "chemical weapon" is [i]A chemical weapon (CW) is a specialized munition that uses chemicals formulated to inflict death or harm on humans.[/i] Zyklon B was never technically formulated to inflict death on humans. Checkm8

And so the U.S. government's trek toward official Holocaust denial continues apace.

Why is everyone in the Trump administration such a character? I can't even name Obama's press secretary. Probably because he wasn't a bumbling idiot. Now, I can name nearly everyone in Trump's administration because they're all idiots.

Socialists always did have a thing for camps of all sorts. Stalin's Gulag Hitler's Holocaust Maduro's forced labor farms FDR's concentration camps for Japanese-Americans.

Politics 101: Don't mention Hitler. Ever. Not even if you think you're attacking him.

You know what he -blam!-ing meant. Stop the liberal smear campaign of moving goalposts and redefining words to attack the current administration and maybe then people will take actually deserved criticism of Trump seriously

Honestly unless you're a holocaust denier ("revisionist") I don't see how you can defend spicer on this one.