{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
2/16/2017 10:34:05 PM
1
I also have a ton of experience with nightstalker- in fact that is all i use. Explain to me how a blade will be better than a nightstalker for aggressive play, cause I think nightstalker is still better even for that playstyle.
English
-
Because an aggressive player can use skip grenades to lead an engagement to force the opponent on their heels. From there, blink in and easily mop them up. If you will refer to an avid BD player in the thread that I'm currently talking to, he agrees that, that is still viable. Smoke is pretty terrible right now, not causing enough disturbances to warrant the time it takes to throw. Firing a shot would be better. Smoke is still best used defensively, same with the grenade option.
-
Youve seen grenader jake play right? He smokes his opponents and flies in with the sidearm- just as good as skip nades for leading an engagement. And if the avid blade you are referring to is sv rocks 3 let me say i know him very well, he also agrees with me and will no longer be using blade.
