-
...how?
-
THEY. CAN'T. Microsoft has the rights and Bungie has signed a deal with Activision. IT IS LEGALLY IMPOSSIBLE. Also, how would you feel if at work or with your hobby you did something amazing and then for the rest of your life people want you to only do the ONE thing, over and over again. It isn't fair to Bungie and 343 did great for their first game.
-
Quit crying about this
-
I don't, Reach was proof bungie can't make a good Halo anymore either.
-
1 ReplyTo be fair I'm a huge Halo fan, but it would have been better if no one continued the Halo series. It left it on a good note and an excellent cliffhanger. Maybe 20 odd years later after Destiny and some other project they do it would be amazing to see a Halo 4 trailer from Bungie at like E3 2030 or something. Imagine how good it would be. The hype would be off the charts!
-
1 ReplyHasn't most of Bungie already returned to Halo?
-
24 RepliesSo we could get a Halo with a half assed story and little to no focus on the campaign? I'm quite intent with 343i's management of the expanded universe.
-
Destiny > Halo
-
1 ReplyNo. But they need to do a better job with Destiny than what they are.
-
Destiny looks interesting enough, hopefully it doesn't get microtransactioned.
-
NO, if they do then its hell all over again.
-
1 ReplyWho thinks OP should return to school?
-
15 Repliesi would love them to, but Microsoft won't allow that.
-
3 RepliesNo. I play Halo for the single player and the story, and 343 are doing a [i]far[/i] better job than Bungie.
-
1 ReplyUr profile pic is lame brah
-
6 RepliesBungie if your listening please buy halo back
-
1 Replystfu enough crying.
-
I want destiny too much good topic
-
No, because Destiny.
-
6 Replies*sigh* Relevant. Give 343 a chance with Halo and give Bungie a chance to spread their wings and fly.
-
Bungie shouldn't go back to Halo since they have other things they want to be working on right now and they've already spent more than enough time on [i]just[/i] Halo.....however that being said, I think by all means Halo should go back to Bungie (I think the same about pretty much all series, that ownership should stay with whoever it was that created it) and I am absolutely positive, given what they said about the matter when they left after Reach, that if the situation ever created or presented itself where they could take ownership and control of the series again, they'd do it in a heart beat. So yes, I think Halo should go back to Bungie and they should have ownership and control of the series....I don't think Bungie should just go back to Halo unless they actually want to work on it again, but they should be the ones in control over it nonetheless.
-
3 RepliesEdited by Halo xp: 5/20/2014 11:07:13 PMremember this .... bungie made halo so without them nothing you like about halo would exist so you should respect them to a point
-
Bungie should do what Bungie wants and thinks will be more fun to create and play. Besides, 343 is better at making Halo than Bungie ever was.
-
They should buy Sony and Microsoft first, then they'll have world domination
-
1 Reply343i is doing a much better job with the story. Bungie dropped the ball with lolReach. I'm glad they're on to making other games (whether or not we'll call it lolDensity awaits to be seen).
-
Edited by BannedCommando: 5/21/2014 11:37:56 AMGod no. After Halo 2 they just stopped trying at it. Halo 3's campaign is lackluster as hell and the first half is completely random. Unless you played it a 2nd time you have no idea what the hell is going on. Reach is just a lore braking mess of a rushed game. Then for their story they couldn't even be bothered in explaining most of the lore like why the war started and what the Spartan programs are when they are a major thing in Halo. It's pathetic that 3rd parties had to explain that stuff for them. The other thing is their weapon sandbox. After Halo CE it just went to shit. There's half weapons and useless weapons like the assault rifle and plasma repeater. It's clear they didn't give a damn about Halo anymore after Halo 2.