{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
9/15/2015 8:47:12 PM
2
Yea and you're putting a cap on the content that a company can deliver by not supporting them.
How about this: go spend $60+ on a new game and see how long you play that for compared to destiny then tell us what is the better value.
English
-
Skyrim. GTA. MW2. Battlefield 3. Any of the Halos except ODST and the 343 titles. Borderlands 2. Eventually, ESO. I have had more fun playing Guitar Hero for -blam!- sakes. Don't get me wrong, I'm not here to shit on Destiny. The 2.0.0 patch actually made the game feel right. But Bungie is essentially putting a Subscription Fee on Destiny. You know what, I'm fine with a Subscription Fee. BUT CALL IT WHAT IT IS. Not this overpriced DLC bullshit.
-
Lol bet money you have more hours logged on destiny than any of those games
-
Not even close. Destiny is like 200-300? I gave more than 1000 into every one of the games I mentioned, and I got more enjoyment from them too.
-
Assuming that's true, you are the exception. Congrats
-
If only Skyrim recorded the hours I have played on that. I have more than one thousand (two level 81s and one level 105, and a few intermediate level 30-60 characters) on Xbox alone, and we'll over 500 hours on PC with different mods and stuff. Halo 3 was the only game I played from its launch until 2009. That isn't even an exageration.
-
ESO already has given me much more enjoyment than destiny..and once fallout 4 comes out I will forget destiny ever existed
