{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
12/14/2019 5:47:03 PM
124
Clash should be the core playlist, not control
Like the title says, clash should be the core playlist and control should be the rotator. I think it would be way more fun to have it that way
-
Modificato da DivMaster Dan: 1/30/2020 1:30:47 AM
-
151 RisposteThanks for the suggestion. Looks like there are a lot of different opinions in the comments. Feel free to reply below with your thoughts if you have not already on if you would like Control to stay as the permanent playlist or if you think Clash should replace it.
-
1 RispondiAlmost everyone plays Clash regardless of the objective anyway.
-
Just because you enjoy camping lanes and corners doesn't mean you're in the majority.
-
1 RispondiClash, Run around looking for a target til the moment they all respawn 10 metres behind you... Control should stay where it is.
-
Speak for yourself bro. I happen to love control.
-
1 RispondiDisagree. Control is the best mode to pull in a wider variety of players. It's less intimidating to newbies.
-
Control is by far the best game mode. Clash is so campy.
-
Clash is much more casual friendly as it is much harder to snowball out of control. Why not keep BOTH?
-
2 RisposteClash is ultimately the best playlist because you don't have to worry about randoms not playing the objective.
-
Or you could have multiple core playlists with shared matchmaking queues like Halo Reach, a game from ten years ago now has in MCC. It boggles my mind that I can't select modes that I want to play and get matched with other players who have selected at least one of the modes I have selected. Instead, the dwindling playerbase is divided up into 6 different playlists.
-
4 RisposteYes, control sucks.
-
3 RisposteI hate classic mix tbh, because it's just control and supremacy. I just want to play clash, I don't care about those other two.
-
-
Agreed.
-
2 RisposteAgreed, make Iron Banner clash as well, or make it something unique. Rift, maybe?
-
Clash is better for not having constant mercy games. Control is better at having people move around more. People will play scummy no matter what the game mode is. I'm fine with either
-
[quote]or both. just sayin'
-
1 RispondiAgreed. I just want to slay, and control is my least favorite game mode. Bad enough Iron banner is only control in D2...
-
2 RisposteFix how aim assist dominates everything in crucible. Mofos wouldn’t know what to do if they’re melees and shoulder charges wouldn’t assist in everything. -blam!-in trash
-
1 RispondiClash please, as Control is already permanently in the Classic playlist...I would rather Clash as the permanent stand alone mode instead of control. Thank you
-
1 RispondiI agree. Sometimes, I don't care for objectives, I just want to SLAY SLAY and SLAY. Basic CLASH, or Slayer, is essential in PVP as it keeps you trained and ready. Objective based mechanics help to increase experiences but not solely as a core list itself. Sometimes, I just want to PVP without capping anything or protecting something, I just want to point, shoot and profit. Upvote, lets get this trending.
-
Why cant they just both be playable always. I mean i get games having rotating playlists if they have alot of modes but destiny doesnt even have that many.
-
I don't see why clash needs to be replaced with any other game mode, it should just be there along side control and rumble permanently, tdm has always been staple of fps games.
-
Modificato da Rivvvers: 12/17/2019 7:04:29 PMcan't believe they replaced clash for team scorched, how lame
-
31 RisposteClash is standing in spawn with your herd or running around with the herd. Boring AF.
