{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
6/13/2018 8:01:40 PM
20
Finland was the only country in WWII that was objectively good.
-
5 RisposteWe don't talk about the winter war here, off to gulag, blyat!
-
1 RispondiWhere’s Finland again? Beside Guam?
-
5 RisposteNothing is objective
-
2 RisposteI Would love your theory on why you think this.
-
15 RisposteModificato da DINO DELUSIONAL: 6/14/2018 3:58:30 AMWell it aided facist pigs. But had excellent Mosin Nagant variants.
-
11 RisposteI feel like the Germans were well intentioned. They just went about it [i]all wrong.[/i]
-
*Eastern Sweden Finland doesn't exist, only Eastern Sweden
-
43 RisposteAwful lot of neonatzis around these parts lately...
-
This is definitely gonna find it's way on ShitWehraboosSay
-
[b][i][u][url=http://example.com][spoiler][quote][/quote][/spoiler]link[/url][/u][/i][/b] Finland
-
1 RispondiClicked post hoping to find a spongebob reference, sorely disappointed.
-
28 RisposteWrong because it wasn't the only one. Poland. Safe country (until [url=http://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin%27s_law]-godwinslaw!-[/url] lol) for Jews and helped get as many out as they could. UK. Helped Poland. High morals. No mistreatment of prisoners. America. Revenge story. Plus hate boner for fascists. Same as U.K. With high morals. Atom Bomb may have sucked but saved more lives than it took. Believe me, an invasion would've ended up as an unintentional genocide. Also helped rebuild Europe and Japan. Canada. I don't need to explain why they are good. France. Yeah. Did nothing wrong.
-
Finland isn't even a real country
-
39 Risposte?????????????????? You do realize that World War II is used as the textbook example of the concept of the "Just War". 1. Germany was basically trying to conquer all of Europe and Northern Africa in unprovoked aggression. 2. Germany murdrered millions of Jews, Gypsies, homosexuals and other "undesirables" in countries they occupied. 3. Germany employed similar tactics against the Russians when they invaded the USSR...since they considered Slavs to be "undesirables" and "sub-humans" as well. 4. Japan attacked the United States and killed 2000 of its citizens in an unprovoked attack in retaliation for US economic sanctions geared at slowing/stopping Japanese colonial expansion in East Asian and the ugly brutalization of China that had been going on for nearly a decade by 12/7/1941. Google "-blam!- of Nanjing" or "Nanjing Massacre". The Japanese committed such systematic and outrageous atrocities against the Chinese civilian population in their war that they were on par with anything that [url=http://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin%27s_law]-godwinslaw!-[/url] did outside of the death camps. Despite multiple Japanese apologies in recent years for their wartime conduct Chinese relations with Japan are chilly....and Korea doesn't view the Japanese in much kinder terms. So in my book, any nation that fought on the side of the Allies is definitionally "good" in this conflict.
-
19 RisposteActually, any and all countries opposing the Axis powers were good. When you are opposing a monumental evil, such as that which existed during the third reich, any opposition must be seen as good.
-
3 RisposteAnyone that oppressed the axis powers was good. Yes ik Russia is in that list they are the exception.
-
-
21 RisposteNo. They were simply seriously underestimated by the Red Army High Command. However, as the war progressed, the Russians learned from their mistakes (just like in the Russo-German war) and broke through the Mannerheim line, defeating Finland completely. Also, according to you there were no other objectively good countries in WW2? What about the Allies? What do you mean by 'objectively good'
-
1 RispondiSo in your opinion was nuking Japan justified?
-
1 RispondiModificato da blade329: 6/18/2018 4:15:17 PMWhat? What is your idea of "objectively good"? The Allies weren't good? Are you kidding?
