EDIT: I thought this would be a 5 post dead thread like all my others. I still say Halo 3 was their peek game in the franchise. I suffice and say that Bungie's artstyle not graphics were better than games since. What they did with what they had is the point. Original post below
Bungie, "We'll be rich!"
lol, Halo 3 was their peek game probably the hardest they worked was on that title. I was upset when they made Reach and left Halo so I actually like that they feel pain over this. They never owned Halo but they must get paid royalties I guess. Hopefully Activision will never screw them over.
I think it's great, Halo 3 has better graphics then Reach or Halo 4 by far, and now that the population is up I can have fun playing it again. Bungie owes its success to Microsoft, and vice versa, they should figure out where they stand and stick to the script or else not get upset.
English
#Gaming
-
5 commentaires[quote]Halo 3 has better graphics then Reach or Halo 4 by far,[/quote] [i]wat[/i] That's like saying Pokemon Emerald has better graphics than Pokemon Black and White.
-
Ah, Halo 3. What the -blam!- happened to Bungie?
-
1 commentaireWe're going to be rich is a poke at it being free. Its supposed to be a joke because you can't make money on something that is free. At least thats how I read it...
-
2 commentaires[quote]I think it's great, Halo 3 has better graphics then Reach or Halo 4 by far,[/quote]
-
[quote]Halo 3 has better graphics then Reach or Halo 4 by far[/quote] No, Reach and 4 definitely have better graphics. 3 had a better [i]art style[/i] though.
-
3 commentaires[quote] Bungie, "We'll be rich!" [/quote] lol wut [quote] lol, Halo 3 was their peek game probably the hardest they worked was on that title. I was upset when they made Reach and left Halo so I actually like that they feel pain over this. [/quote] "Halo Reach wasn't Halo 3.5 so that means its bad." [quote] They never owned Halo but they must get paid royalties I guess. [/quote] bahahaha [quote] Hopefully Activision will never screw them over. [/quote] We'll have to wait and see. [quote] I think it's great, Halo 3 has better graphics then Reach or Halo 4 by far [/quote] Never go full retard. [quote] and now that the population is up I can have fun playing it again. [/quote] The population will only be like this for a week and then people will move on like they did before. [quote] Bungie owes its success to Microsoft, and vice versa, they should figure out where they stand and stick to the script or else not get upset. [/quote] Microsoft never did anything good for Bungie. All they did was rush them when they were making ODST and Reach. I'm so glad they're not with Microsoft anymore.
-
[quote]Halo 3 has better graphics[/quote] Best joke 2013
-
Modifié par Cheesy : 10/19/2013 11:20:13 PM[quote]the hardest they worked was on that title.[/quote] What. You've watched the Halo 2 Making Of documentary, right? [quote]I was[i][b] upset[/b] [/i]when they made Reach and left Halo so I actually like that they feel pain over this. [/quote] *looks at Halo: Reach stats/rank* Uh, yeah, sure, I doubt that. [quote]Halo 3 has better graphics then Reach or Halo 4 [/quote] ...lol
-
3 commentaires[quote]They never owned Halo[/quote] I'm laughing so hard at this, i can't even read the rest of your "post".
-
7 commentairesThe hardest they worked on? WHAT?
-
[quote]I think it's great, Halo 3 has better graphics then Reach or Halo 4 by far[/quote]
-
3 commentairesBungie doesn't care! That's why they made that silly remark. They're on to bigger and better things, too busy with Destiny to even care about Halo. Honestly they couldn't care less, otherwise they would have said more... [i]A lot[/i] more. Halo is in the past now... Owned by a corrupt company who wants to milk every penny off of it.
-
Halo was never Bungies after M$ bought them.
-
They don't get royalties, microsoft owns halo, legally they owe Bungie nothing
-
1 commentaire[quote]better graphics [u][i][b]than[/b][/i][/u] Reach or Halo 4[/quote] Moron.
-
-
2 commentairesHalo 3 does [i]not[/i] have better graphics than Halo 4. That's nostalgia talking. I've played both, and I know that Halo 4 looks gorgeous. And the "we'll be rich" joke was just that - a joke.
-
Modifié par BerzerkCommando : 10/19/2013 1:38:30 PMHalo Reach and Halo 4 have better graphics then 3. They are a lot more detailed and look more realistic. Halo 3 looks more cartoonist compared to them.
-
21 commentaires[quote]I think it's great, Halo 3 has better graphics then Reach or Halo 4 by far[/quote]No it didn't. And the words you're looking for are 'art style'.
-
-
5 commentairesModifié par kgj : 10/18/2013 11:44:34 PM[quote]lol, Halo 3 was their peek game[/quote] Not even close to it, IMO. [quote]Halo 3 has better graphics then Reach or Halo 4 by far[/quote] Graphics =/= Art Style. Technically, Halo 4 and Reach far surpass Halo 3. A single AR in Halo Reach was made of more polygons than an entire marine in 3. Artistically? All up to opinion. And IMO, Halo 4's art style is far superior to both (while I'll still maintain a fondness for Halo 3 at times). And, uh, your entire argument is wrong considering it's clearly a sarcastic joke...
-
[quote]Halo 3 has better graphics then Reach or Halo 4 by far[/quote] -.^
-
2 commentairesWell I went on halo 3 this morning to play the last level and when halo 3 started it came up with an matchmaking update page and on the bottom it showed the 343 logo
-
So how are they upset?
-
Halo 4 has far superior graphics to Reach and Halo 3.
-
I know you're a fan and all, as are we all but this: [quote]Halo 3 has better graphics then Reach or Halo 4 by far[/quote] is the dumbest thing I've ever read. If you don't like the other games, fine. But to say Halo 4 is not graphically superior to Halo 3 is just ignorant. [url=http://toktak247.files.wordpress.com/2010/04/halo3_1.jpg]Halo 3[/url] [url=http://allgamesplayed.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/halo-reach-gameplay-shot-21.jpg]Halo Reach[/url] [url=http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-x2hpeiiyoSo/UKGr0t2Y8UI/AAAAAAAAAxk/z88VcqGG3Hw/s1600/Halo4-Gameplay-4.jpg]Halo 4[/url]