Disregarding anything that happened in WWII, which side would you pick?
Your opinion can be based on a battle scenario where each side has an equal number of troops, the same equipment and gear, and an equal sided battlefield.
Or, it could be based on pure favorites.
Which side do you choose?
English
#Offtopic
-
Soviets won in WWII because sheer manpower. In and even numbers scenario [url=http://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin%27s_law]-godwinslaw!-[/url] Germany would win because superior training and technology.
-
It was a pity Germany couldn't win Russia on the eastern front.
-
Dis is difficult
-
Modifié par Dragotor24 : 8/17/2015 10:11:18 PM[url=http://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin%27s_law]-godwinslaw!-[/url] would lose
-
Germans had better everything. Just a dumbass leader who didn't know shit about military strategy.
-
2 commentaires[url=http://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin%27s_law]-godwinslaw!-[/url]. Because of those SS nutjobs.
-
Germans, hands down. Better training, better disciplined, better technology, more experience, better tactics.
-
2 commentairesModifié par MagnumSentinel : 8/17/2015 5:30:34 PMThe Wehrmacht was possibly the finest military force of the twentieth century. They were superbly trained and very well disciplined. The Germans had very talented commanders such as Guderian and Rommel. They mastered the art of maneuver warfare. The Germans were able to deliver a swift and humiliating defeat to the French army, which was many times the size of the Wehrmacht. The reason the Germans lost to the Soviets was because of old Adolf's stupidity. Had Hitler not delayed the attack on Moscow and diverted his panzers elsewhere, Army Group Center would have captured the city by the winter. Also, Moscow should have been the priority of all three Army Groups, not just center. If Army Group North, Center, and South (with a combined total of over 2 million soldiers) all aimed for Moscow, the Russians would not have stood a chance. Leningrad and Stalingrad were simply not important targets. Plus, the Soviets were just beginning to recover from Stalin's purges of the Red Army's generals. They were uncoordinated and under equipped at the time. The Germans drove them back over 600 miles. Impressive, considering how badly they were outnumbered. TL;DR: In an even battle, the Germans would win.
-
1 commentaireIn a standard fight all thing being equal, Germans stomp the shit out of the Russians. But, there were so many factors to Germany's defeat.
-
In Soviet Russia...
-
In Soviet Russia...
-
I'd side with Soviet but I would not want to be a soldier How are you supposed to fight a war without a gun?
-
Hitler's ego and the timing of the invasion of Russia doomed the N@zis from the start.
-
HAIL MOTHER RUSSIA
-
Russians Why?: Accents Metro 2033, last light + books T-34 tanks Vodka The germans lost WW2 The AK The RPG The Mosin Nagant
-
2 commentairesGood lord the Germans were far better trained. And if we're talking weapons, the Germans were far superior (Russian T-35 was a marvel of the tank world though)
-
1 commentaireRussia if they're fueled by vodka
-
WWII Russia
-
You don't -blam!- with Russia.
-
Modifié par uknownsoulja : 8/17/2015 4:32:33 AMthe irony of me being a black Hitler Henchman is just too good to pass up. not to mention that snazzy uniforms
-
Soviets cuz metro 2033
-
5 commentairesModifié par Drakus Darksoul : 8/17/2015 3:52:57 AMThe German army didn't rapè Eastern Europe.
-
3 commentairesModifié par navy seal : 8/17/2015 3:42:55 AMSchwerer Gustav disagree with this poll's results.
-
1 commentaireI liked the Soviet Tanks way more. And they were ruthless and effective. They had good snipers and weapons.
-
Germany, the ME-262 and ME-163 were years ahead of even the P-51 and Typhoon. If Hitler had actually not tried to make "wonder weapons" Germany might've won.
-
Názis were way ahead of the rest of the world in its weapon/medical technology.