{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
1/20/2015 4:32:29 PM
4
Unfortunately I have never agreed with the games where you have to pay a monthly subscription for in order to play. They are already wanting you to pay $60 for the game then they want you to pay another $15 per month in order to play it, where as I can buy another new game for $60 and not pay anything after that in order to keep playing it. About the only game that I would pay monthly to play would be the new PSO due to being a huge PS fan if it ever makes it over here.
English
-
I don't see a problem with it at all. Most games that require a monthly fee have more content because all that money is being funneled back into it. Every expansion that's added will come with tons of new stuff. I'd love to play PSO2 again. Me and a friend downloaded it, along with all the translation stuff for it, and played for a few months before other games started coming out.
-
Not all, but some. And I do like the idea of them doing that but I still don't like that monthly fee. Look at how Tera Online does it. They are f2p but they also have a subscription service that is only beneficial. On top of that it isn't required to get this service to get anywhere in the game, it just gives you massive perks. The game also isn't p2w, anything you can put your money down on is purely cosmetic.
-
Well actually. If you have psplus it's only $20 for the full game! #worthit
-
Regardless, you are still paying $15 a month to play a game you have already paid for on top of needing to pay for PS Plus. Which would be equivalent to buying a microwave and you have to pay for the electricity to use it on top of a fee to use it every month just because you have it. Of course you cancel at any time but then it becomes useless.
