{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
3/3/2014 7:50:16 AM
1
Actually, this is a decent counter against anyone who is pro-choice, and pro-universal healthcare. They say that being pro-choice means that it the woman's right to her body, and its up to her to carry a baby to life or not. You could say that applies to healthcare, and the tax payer has the right to his or her money, and its up to them to pay or not to support another.
Interesting, must give this some thought...
English
-
It doesn't need to be black and white. This is a huge problem with "principle". Why not use logic instead? Legalising abortion has many benefits when compared to the alternative. Extending that principle to an economic asset is utterly backwards.
